SAC Detroit to SAC Seattle re interviews showing composite drawing of unsub

Document date 8 December 1971

Part 15pages 314–3174 pagesDB Cooper-4190–4193

Open in FBI Vault (Part 15, page 314 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-15:314-317

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-15:314-317

Document: Airtel SAC Detroit to SAC Seattle re interviews showing composite drawing of unsub
Id: Cooper-Part-15:314-317
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-15%3A314-317

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 15 pp. 314–317 (DB Cooper-4190–4193), Airtel, dated 8 Dec 1971, serial SE 164-81-1089 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-15%3A314-317

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)

FBI

Date: 12/8/71

Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code)

Via AIRTEL (Priority)

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE

FROM: SAC, DETROIT (164-115) P

RE: UNSUB; Northwest Airlines, Flight 305 Portland to Seattle, 11/24/71 CAA - HIJACKING (EXTORTION) (OO: Seattle)

---

Re Washington Field teletype to Director, 11/30/71. [REDACTED] Suspect).

On 12/1/71, [REDACTED] Identification Section, [REDACTED] Police Department, advised that there was no record for the suspect.

On 12/1/71, [REDACTED] Identification Section, [REDACTED] Sheriff's Office, advised that there was no record for the suspect.

On 12/1/71, [REDACTED] Credit Bureau of Greater [REDACTED] advised that there was a record for the suspect, showing that he resides [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] She further advised that the suspect resided in [REDACTED]

She stated that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] The records also showed he was listed as [REDACTED]

---

(2) - Seattle 2 - Detroit RPS:nar (4)

---

164-[guess: 81]-1089 [illegible stamps and initials]

---

Approved: ___________ Sent _________ M Per _________ Special Agent in Charge

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1969 O - 346-090 (11) DB Cooper-4190

---

E / [guess: im]

On 12/1/71, [REDACTED] Postmaster, [REDACTED] was shown the composite drawing of the unknown subject and stated that he did not recognize him as anyone he knew. He advised that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] but stated that the composite did not look like [guess: AVIUS]. He further advised that [REDACTED — large blank/redacted block]

---

On 12/1/71, [REDACTED] was interviewed at her place of employment, [REDACTED] stated that she could not identify the composite of the unknown subject. She stated that [REDACTED]

---

On 12/1/71, [REDACTED] stated that he did not recognize the composite of the unknown subject as anyone that he knew and could provide no information concerning [REDACTED]. He stated that he did not know of [REDACTED] being involved in any illegal activities. He stated he did not know whether [REDACTED] was at home on 11/24/71.

---

On 12/1/71, [REDACTED] stated that he did not recognize the com- posite of the unknown subject and that it did not look like anyone that he knew. He stated that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] He stated that he did not know whether [REDACTED] was at home on 11/24/71.

---

b6 b7c

---

- 2 -

DB Cooper-4191

Dd 164-115

---

On 12/1/71, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] said that he did not recognize the composite of the unknown subject as anyone he knew. He said that he did not know [REDACTED] at all except to say "Hi" to him on the streets

He further advised that he did not know if the suspect was home on 11/24/71 and he did not know of him being involved in any illegal activities.

---

On 12/4/71, [REDACTED] was interviewed at the [REDACTED] and stated that on 11/24/71, [REDACTED]

[REDACTED]

He also advised that

[REDACTED] He further advised that he did not recognize the com- posite of the unknown subject as anyone he knew and stated that he had been [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] had some obvious dissimilarities, especially in his face, when compared to the composite, particularly his nose [REDACTED] and the shape of his face [REDACTED] In addition, [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] complexion. The suspect stated that he did not have a photo of himself [REDACTED]

---

The following description of the suspect, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] was obtained through observation and interview:

Race White Sex Male Height 6'

---

- 3 -

DB Cooper-4192

DE 164-115

Weight 190 pounds Hair [REDACTED b6/b7C] Eyes [REDACTED b6/b7C] Complexion [REDACTED b6/b7C] DOB [REDACTED b6/b7C] POB [REDACTED b6/b7C]

---

On 12/6/71, [REDACTED b6/b7C] advised that [REDACTED b6/b7C] on 11/24/71 [REDACTED - large block of text withheld under b6/b7C]

---

UNKNOWN SUBJECT IS CONSIDERED DANGEROUS.

---

- 4 -

DB Cooper-4193

Serials: DE 164-115, SE 164-81-1089