Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Las Vegas re NORJAK
Document date 16 December 1971
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-17:003-003
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-17:003-003 Document: Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Las Vegas re NORJAK Id: Cooper-Part-17:003-003 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-17%3A003-003 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 17 p. 3 (DB Cooper-4826), Report, dated 16 Dec 1971, serial SE 164-81-1399 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-17%3A003-003
1-336 (Rev. 12-10-63) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Washington, D. C. 20537 REPORT of the IDENTIFICATION DIVISION LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION
YOUR FILE NO. 164-60 FBI FILE NO. 164-2111 LATENT CASE NO. A-45410
December 16, 1971
TO: SAC, Las Vegas
---
Sub 130
---
RE: NORJAK
---
REFERENCE: Airtel 12-6-71 EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Las Vegas SPECIMENS: Envelope, Q15 Accompanying message, Q16 Elimination fingerprints of [REDACTED]
---
Two latent fingerprints of value developed Q15 have been identified as elimination fingerprints of [REDACTED]. No additional latent prints or value developed.
Q15 and Q16, which are enclosed, are further described in separate Laboratory report. Fingerprints [REDACTED] being retained Latent Fingerprint Section for use in possible future submission this case.
This report supplements and confirms Butel of 12-15-71.
---
Enc. (2) (2)- Seattle (164-81) 1 - Portland (164-41) 1 - Sacramento
---
164- 81-1399 SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED [illegible] John Edgar Hoover, DIREG DEC 20 1971 FBI - SEATTLE
---
THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
---
DB Cooper-4826
---
b6 b7C b6 b7C
Serials: 164-2111, LV 164-60, PD 164-41, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-1399
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.