SAC Louisville to SAC Los Angeles re attempts to contact witness in Kentucky

Document date 27 December 1971

Part 17page 4551 pageDB Cooper-5289

Open in FBI Vault (Part 17, page 455 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-17:455-455

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-17:455-455

Document: Airtel SAC Louisville to SAC Los Angeles re attempts to contact witness in Kentucky
Id: Cooper-Part-17:455-455
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-17%3A455-455

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 17 p. 455 (DB Cooper-5289), Airtel, dated 27 Dec 1971 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-17%3A455-455

12/27/71

AIRTEL AIRMAIL

[REDACTED - b6, b7C]

TO: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497) FROM: SAC, LOUISVILLE (164-71) (P) SUBJECT: NORJACK OO: SEATTLE

---

Re Los Angeles nitel to Louisville, dated 12/21/71.

[REDACTED]s attempts have been made to contact [REDACTED] at her residence between 12/22/71, and 12/2[7]/71, with negative results.

[REDACTED] Kentucky, [REDACTED] advised 12/27/71, the [REDACTED] left on 12/22/71, to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] exact location unknown, and are not expected back until 1/3/72. [REDACTED] was unable to furnish name of anyone who would know [REDACTED] address [REDACTED]

---

LEAD:

LOUISVILLE

AT [REDACTED] KENTUCKY. Will contact [REDACTED] [REDACTED] upon her return 1/3/72, as requested in referenced communication.

---

2-Los Angeles (RM) 1-Seattle (164-81) (RM) 2-Louisville

JKP/jr (5)

[STAMP: AIRTEL [illegible] ...ROUS]

-1627 [stamp/initials]

DB Cooper-5289

Serials: LA 164-497, LS 164-71, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.