SAC Seattle to SAC Portland re Sacramento photograph shown to witnesses
Document date 20 January 1972
Also filed at: Part 102 p. 332
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-20:064-064
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-20:064-064 Document: Airtel SAC Seattle to SAC Portland re Sacramento photograph shown to witnesses Id: Cooper-Part-20:064-064 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-20%3A064-064 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 20 p. 64 (DB Cooper-6021), Airtel, dated 20 Jan 1972, serial SE 164-81-1988 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-20%3A064-064
1/20/72
---
AIRTEL AIRMAIL
TO : SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) FROM : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) SUBJECT: NORJAK
Re Portland airtel to San Francisco, 1/17/72 and Sacramento airtel to Seattle, 12/16/71.
RE: [REDACTED]
Referenced Sacramento airtel advised photograph of [REDACTED] furnished was most current photograph available. Photograph shown to witnesses at Seattle could not identify [REDACTED] as UNSUB.
If Portland is showing other photographs to witnesses, it is suggested that photograph of [REDACTED] be shown with other photos for elimination purposes.
---
2 - Portland 1 - Sacramento (164-50) (INFO) (2)- Seattle JSD:set (5) [initials]
---
[partially legible stamp] [guess: Mailed] [date] [guess: Serialized] [initials] [guess: Indexed] [initials] [guess: Filed] [initials]
---
164-81-1988 DB Cooper-6021
---
b6 b7C
Serials: PD 164-41, SC 164-50, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-1988
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.