SAC Salt Lake City to SAC Los Angeles re NORJAK suspect associate interview

Document date 20 January 1972

Part 20page 1271 pageDB Cooper-6084

Open in FBI Vault (Part 20, page 127 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-20:127-127

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-20:127-127

Document: Airtel SAC Salt Lake City to SAC Los Angeles re NORJAK suspect associate interview
Id: Cooper-Part-20:127-127
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-20%3A127-127

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 20 p. 127 (DB Cooper-6084), Airtel, dated 20 Jan 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-20%3A127-127

1/20/72

---

AIRTEL AIRMAIL

TO: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497) FROM: SAC, SALT LAKE CITY (164-24) (P) RE: NORJAK (OO: SE)

Re: Suspect [REDACTED]

Suspect's [REDACTED] Utah, was interviewed on 1/20/72 by SA [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] indicated he has been retired for the past five years, and in conversation was not advised directly by SA [REDACTED] of the reason of the inquiry. [REDACTED] indicated he believed inquiry was made due to [REDACTED] with the [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] was asked if he had seen suspect in recent weeks and he stated he had not; however, suspect had visited him for Thanksgiving 1971, having arrived at his residence one or two days prior to Thanksgiving and staying a total of some four or five days at his residence. [REDACTED] indicated suspect had been at [REDACTED] Utah, on 11/24/71.

ARMED AND DANGEROUS.

---

2 - Los Angeles (1)- Seattle (164-81) (Info) 2 - Salt Lake City

RWH:nsb (5)

---

[handwritten] (64-81-[illegible]) SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____ JAN 2 1972 FBI - SEATTLE

---

DB Cooper-6084

---

b6 b7C

Serials: LA 164-497, SE 164-81, SU 164-24

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.