Nitel Dallas to Oklahoma City, Seattle and San Antonio re NORJAK interview

Document date 9 February 1972

Part 22pages 80–823 pagesDB Cooper-6422–6424

Also filed separately as sections:

Open in FBI Vault (Part 22, page 80 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-22:080-082

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-22:080-082

Document: Nitel Dallas to Oklahoma City, Seattle and San Antonio re NORJAK interview
Id: Cooper-Part-22:080-082
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-22%3A080-082

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 22 pp. 80–82 (DB Cooper-6422–6424), Teletype, dated 9 Feb 1972, serial SE 164-81-2200 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-22%3A080-082

NR 008 DL PLAIN 623PM NITEL 2-9-72 TPR TO OKLAHOMA CITY (164-56) SEATTLE (164-81) SAN ANTONIO FROM DALLAS (164-191)

---

NORJAK.

RE OKLAHOMA CITY NITEL TO DALLAS, DEC. EIGHT LAST. FOR INFO OF SAN ANTONIO, REFERENCED AIRTEL STATES [REDACTED] [REDACTED] REPORTEDLY KNEW [REDACTED] [REDACTED] THERE AND STATED HE HAD KNOWN [REDACTED] [REDACTED] NOV. LAST AND THEY DISCUSSED HIJACKING AN AIRLINER AND PARACHUTING OUT. THE UNKNOWN [REDACTED] REPORTEDLY SAID THAT A COMPOSITE OF THE SUB- JECT OF THIS CASE RESEMBLED [REDACTED] HE HAD KNOWN [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

---

ON FEB. NINE INSTANT, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] STATED HE HAD HEARD FROM [REDACTED] THE STORY MENTIONED ABOVE. HE STATED THAT SOMETIME IN DEC. LAST [REDACTED] MENTIONED IN PASSING THAT HE HAD KNOWN [REDACTED] WHO DISCUSSED END PAGE ONE

---

164-81-2200 SEARCHED_____ INDEXED_____ SERIALIZED_/1/2_ FILED_/1/1_ FEB 08 1972 FBI - SEATTLE

---

DB Cooper-6422

PAGE TWO 164-191

---

A HIJACKING SIMILAR TO THAT IN THIS CASE. HE DID NOT IDENTIFY [REDACTED] OR GIVE ANY FURTHER DETAILS. [REDACTED] STATED HE DID NOT KNOW IF [REDACTED] WAS SERIOUS OR NOT.

[REDACTED]

[REDACTED] DENIED ANY KNOWLEDGE OF [REDACTED] [REDACTED] DISCUSSING AN AIRPLANE HIJACKING. HE STATED HE HAD NEVER BEEN IN [REDACTED] AND KNOWS NO ONE WHO HAS BEEN IN [REDACTED] EXCEPT THOSE PERSONS PRESENTLY [REDACTED] [REDACTED] DENIED EVER HAVING TOLD ANYONE THAT HE KNEW SUCH AN INDIVIDUAL AND STATED THAT THE ONLY PERSONS HE KNEW WHO HAD [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] IN NOV. LAST. HE STATED THAT THESE PERSONS, WHOSE NAMES WERE UNKNOWN TO HIM, HAD NEVER DISCUSSED WITH HIM AN AIRPLANE HI- JACKING. HE IDENTIFIED ONE OF THE [REDACTED]

[REDACTED]

[REDACTED] WOULD NOT ADMIT ANY KNOWLEDGE OR POSSIBLE SUSPECT IN INSTANT CASE AND DENIED EVER HAVING STATED THAT HE END PAGE TWO

---

DB Cooper-6423

---

b6 b7C

PAGE THREE 164-191

---

KNEW OF SUCH A PERSON.

RECORDS [REDACTED] REFLECTED THAT NEITHER [REDACTED] NOR [REDACTED] HAVE EVER BEEN [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] DESCRIBED [REDACTED] AS SOMEWHAT UNSTABLE AND A CONFIRMED LIAR. [REDACTED] STATED THAT IN HIS OPINION [REDACTED] IS THE MORE TRUSTWORTHYOF THE TWO.

---

[REDACTED] WILL DETERMINE IF [REDACTED] [REDACTED] IN NOV. LAST AND IF SO [REDACTED] WILL DETERMINE IF ANY OF [REDACTED] FIT THE DESCRIPTION OF THE UNKNOWN SUBJECT IN THIS CASE AND WILL OBTAIN, IF [guess: AVAILABLE], PHOTOGRAPHS OF [REDACTED] TO BE FURNISHED TO SEATTLE.

- P -

END

---

b6 b7C

---

DB Cooper-6424

Serials: DL 164-191, OC 164-56, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-2200