SAC Savannah to SAC Seattle (RUC) re negative results from Savannah Division sources
Document date 24 February 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-23:047-047
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-23:047-047 Document: Airtel SAC Savannah to SAC Seattle (RUC) re negative results from Savannah Division sources Id: Cooper-Part-23:047-047 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-23%3A047-047 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 23 p. 47 (DB Cooper-7156), Airtel, dated 24 Feb 1972, serial SE 164-81-2375 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-23%3A047-047
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 2/24/72
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL (Priority) -------------------------------------------------------
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, SAVANNAH (164-29) (RUC)
RE: UNSUB; NORTHWEST AIRLINES FLIGHT 305 11/24/71 CAA - HIJACKING OO: SEATTLE
Re Seattle letter to Albany dated 11/30/71.
All logical sources and all law enforcement agencies in the Savannah Division have been contacted regarding this matter and shown artist's conception of UNSUB with negative results. Copies of the serial numbers of the ransom money were distributed to all major banks in the Savannah Division with negative results.
If any information is developed by this office it will immediately be forwarded by appropriate communication to Seattle. Since no further investigation remains for Savannah, this matter is considered RUC.
(2)- Seattle 1 - Savannah WJB/fme (3)
---
164-81-2375 SEARCHED___INDEXED___ SERIALIZED___FILED___ MAR 20 1972 FBI - SEATTLE
---
Approved: ___[signature]___ Sent __________ M Per __________ Special Agent in Charge DB Cooper-7156
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-2375, SV 164-29
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.