San Francisco to Director and field offices re NORJAK

Document date 11 April 1972

Part 24page 3041 pageDB Cooper-7704

Also filed at: Part 110 p. 530

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 24, page 304 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-24:304-304

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-24:304-304

Document: Teletype San Francisco to Director and field offices re NORJAK
Id: Cooper-Part-24:304-304
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-24%3A304-304

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 24 p. 304 (DB Cooper-7704), Teletype, dated 11 Apr 1972, serial 184-61-2665 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-24%3A304-304

NR 019 SF PLAINTEXT 8:59PM NITEL 4/11/72 JAK TO DIRECTOR (164-2111) SALT LAKE CITY SEATTLE PORTLAND CHICAGO FROM SAN FRANCISCO (164-220) 1P

---

Sub 386

---

NORJAK

RE RICHARD FLOYD MC COY, JR., CAA - HIJACKING; INTERFERENCE WITH FLIGHT CREW MEMBERS. OO: SU

RE SU TEL TO BUREAU, ET AL, DATED APRIL TEN LAST.

ON APRIL ELEVEN INSTANT, [REDACTED] HUGHES AIR WEST, SECOND AND ELLSWORTH, SAN MATEO, CALIF., MADE AVAILABLE THE HUGHES AIR WEST TICKETS REQUESTED IN REFERENCED COMMUNICATION. THE ABOVE MENTIONED TICKETS WERE REVIEWED AS REQUESTED IN RETEL. THE REVIEW OF THESE TICKETS WAS MET WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. THIS REVIEW FAILED TO REFLECT ANY R. MC COY D.B. COOPER, OR ANY NAME SIMILAR, FLYING FROM SU TO SE, OR PD, OR FROM

PD OR SE TO SU. END... PLS ACK FOR TWO TELS ACKN NR'S 012 & 019 FEE FBI SEATTLE CLR

---

184-61-2665 SEARCHED... INDEXED... FILED... APR 14 1972 FBI - SEATTLE

---

DB Cooper-7704

---

[REDACTED]

Serials: 164-2111, 184-61-2665, SF 164-220

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.