SAC San Francisco to Director re Hughes Air West ticket check for Cooper and McCoy

Document date 12 April 1972

Part 24page 3381 pageDB Cooper-7738

Also filed at: Part 110 p. 514

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 24, page 338 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-24:338-338

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-24:338-338

Document: Teletype SAC San Francisco to Director re Hughes Air West ticket check for Cooper and McCoy
Id: Cooper-Part-24:338-338
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-24%3A338-338

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 24 p. 338 (DB Cooper-7738), Teletype, dated 12 Apr 1972, serial SE 164-81-2679 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-24%3A338-338

NR 003 SF PLAIN 1251PM URGENT 4-12-72 MS TO DIRECTOR (164-2111) SALT LAKE CITY (164-24) SEATTLE (164-81) PORTLAND CHICAGO FROM SAN FRANCISCO (164-220) 1P

---

Sub 386

---

NORJAK

RE RICHARD FLOYD MC COY, JR. CAA - HIJACKING; INTERFERENCE WITH FLIGHT CREW MEMBERS, OO: SALT LAKE CITY RE SEATTLE TEL TO BUREAU, ET AL, APRIL ELEVEN LAST; AND SAN FRANCISCO TEL TO BUREAU, ET AL, APRIL ELEVEN LAST. REVIEW OF TICKETS AT HUGHES AIR WEST, SAN MATEO, CALIF., FAILED TO REFLECT ANY COOPER OR ANY MC COY FLYING BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY TO PORTLAND OR SEATTLE OR FROM PORTLAND OR SEATTLE TO SALT LAKE CITY. DURING REVIEW OF TICKETS, REVIEWING PERSONNEL WERE INTRUCTED TO PULL ANY TICKETS WITH NAMES COOPER OR MC COY ON THEM. NO TICKETS LOCATED. REVIEW CONDUCTED BY BUAGENTS. END JJT

---

FBI SEATTLE CLR SEARCHED......INDEXED...... SERIALIZED /221 FILED /24/ APR 12 1972 FBI - SEATTLE

---

164-81-2679

---

DB Cooper-7738

Serials: 164-2111, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-2679, SF 164-220, SU 164-24

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.