Miami to Seattle re NORJAK campsite subject and Erie, PA contacts
Document date 14 April 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-24:509-510
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-24:509-510 Document: Teletype Miami to Seattle re NORJAK campsite subject and Erie, PA contacts Id: Cooper-Part-24:509-510 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-24%3A509-510 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 24 pp. 509–510 (DB Cooper-7923–7924), Teletype, dated 14 Apr 1972, serial SE 164-81-2925 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-24%3A509-510
NR006 MM PLAIN 1030PM NITEL 4-14-72 CLS TO SEATTLE 164-81 JACKSONVILLE MILWAUKEE 164-37 PITTSBURGH FROM MIAMI 164-552 2P
NORJAK. OO: SEATTLE.
RE MILWAUKEE NITEL TO MIAMI, APRIL TWELVE, SEVENTYTWO.
[REDACTED] LOCATED AT CAMPSITE, CLEWISTON, FLORIDA, APRIL THIRTEEN, SEVENTYTWO, AND ADVISED IN FREQUENT CONTACT WITH [REDACTED] [REDACTED] WISCONSIN.
[REDACTED] ADVISED IN CONTACT, HAD HUMOROUSLY REFERRED TO A HIJACKING IN WHICH THE SUBJECT HAD USED THE ALIAS OF D.B :9934, COOPER, AS [REDACTED] MANY YEARS AGO HAD AN ASSOCIATE BY THIS NAME IN ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA, WHO HAS BEEN DEAD APPROXIMATELY TEN YEARS. [REDACTED] ADVISED A SONG RECENTLY WRITTEN ABOUT THIS HIJACKING WAS AMUSING TO THEM AS THEY HAD PREVIOUSLY KNOWN A D.B. COOPER, END PAGE ONE
---
164-81-2925
---
SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____ APR [guess: 14] 1972 FBI - SEATTLE
---
DB Cooper-7923
---
COOPER
MM 164-552 PAGE TWO IN ERIE, PA., AND AS STATED, IT WAS A SOURCE OF AMUSEMENT IN CONTACT WITH [REDACTED] [REDACTED] HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO KNOWLEDGE CONCERNING HIJACKING AND NO KNOWLEDGE CONCERNING THE SUBJECT INVOLVED IN THIS CASE USING ALIAS OF D.B. COOPER. [REDACTED] AT LOSS AS TO HOW CONVERSATION WITH [REDACTED] COULD HAVE BEEN CONSTRUED TO INDICATE THAT THEY KNEW THE SUBJECT OR HAD ANY INFORMATION, INDICATING THE SUBJECT MIGHT HAVE CONTACTED A RELATIVE IN FLORIDA. RELATIVES IN FLORIDA ARE [REDACTED] [REDACTED] JUST OUT OF [REDACTED] FLA., AND [REDACTED] WHO WORKS [REDACTED] [REDACTED] END HOLD DCA FBI SE
---
b6 b7C
---
DB Cooper-7924
Serials: MI 164-37, MM 164-552, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-2925
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.