SAC Minneapolis to SAC Seattle re NORJAK lead
Document date 24 April 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-25:081-081
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-25:081-081 Document: Airtel SAC Minneapolis to SAC Seattle re NORJAK lead Id: Cooper-Part-25:081-081 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-25%3A081-081 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 25 p. 81 (DB Cooper-8057), Airtel, dated 24 Apr 1972, serial SE 164-81-2925 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-25%3A081-081
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 4/24/72
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL ________________________ (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, MINNEAPOLIS (164-73) (P) SUBJECT: NORJAK
Re Seattle letter to Los Angeles, 4/5/72; Kansas City airtel to Seattle, 3/16/72; Portland telephone call to Minneapolis, 4/4/72; Los Angeles airtel to Seattle, 4/7/72; Seattle letter to Minneapolis, 4/13/72.
---
The following photographs were displayed to North- western Airlines stewardesses [REDACTED] on 4-[guess: 23]-b6 who advised that the following individuals did not resemble b7C Unsub:
Suspect Office
Kansas City Portland Seattle Seattle Los Angeles Los Angeles Los Angeles
---
CONSIDER DANGEROUS
(2)- Seattle 2 - Kansas City (164-80) 2 - Los Angeles (164-497) 2 - Portland (164-41) 2 - Minneapolis RWG:cmm (10)
---
11/4-81 - 2925 SEARCHED..........INDEXED........ SERIALIZED....FILED.... APR 0 6 1972 FBI - SEATTLE
---
[guess: Jules] as [guess: below]
---
Approved: _______________ Sent _____________ M Per ___________ Special Agent in Charge ☆ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1971-413-135 DB Cooper-8057
Serials: KC 164-80, LA 164-497, MP 164-73, PD 164-41, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-2925
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.