Re Tropicana Hotel-Casino registration check, negative results
Interviewed 13 April 1972
Also filed at: Part 110 p. 416 · Part 110 p. 466
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Part of: Of investigation, Salt Lake City, re Richard Floyd McCoy, Jr. as NORJAK suspect
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-25:108-108
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-25:108-108 Document: FD-302 re Tropicana Hotel-Casino registration check, negative results Id: Cooper-Part-25:108-108 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-25%3A108-108 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 25 p. 108 (DB Cooper-8084), FD-302 interview, interviewed 13 Apr 1972, serial SE 164-81-2999 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-25%3A108-108
FD-302 (Rev. 1-15-64)
---
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Date 4/13/72
On April 13, 1972, [redacted] Tropicana Hotel - Casino, Las Vegas, Nevada, caused the hotel registration records and the arrival records to be checked for November, 1971, and more specifically November 25, 1971. The names checked were as follows:
R. MC COY RICHARD FLOYD MC COY, JR. DAN COOPER and D. COOPER
[redacted] stated there was no record that any individual using the above names registered into the Tropicana Hotel during the month of November, 1971.
---
On 4/13/72 at Las Vegas, Nevada File # LV 164-60 by SA [redacted] mtc Date dictated [illegible]
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
---
164-81-2999 SERIALIZED / FILED APR 20 1972 SEATTLE
---
DB Cooper-8084
---
b6 b7c
Serials: LV 164-60, SE 164-81-2999
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.