SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect, with SF 164-220 report pages
Document date 28 April 1972
Also filed at: Part 59 pp. 125–127
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-25:342-344
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-25:342-344 Document: Airtel SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect, with SF 164-220 report pages Id: Cooper-Part-25:342-344 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-25%3A342-344 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 25 pp. 342–344 (DB Cooper-8411–8413), Airtel, dated 28 Apr 1972, serial SE 164-81-3399 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-25%3A342-344
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI Date: 4/28/72
Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL AIR MAIL ________________________(Priority)________________________
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, SAN FRANCISCO (164-220) SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: Seattle
Re: Possible suspect [REDACTED]
---
Re Los Angeles airtel to Seattle, dated 4/17/72 and Las Vegas airtel to San Francisco, 3/28/72.
AT SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
On 4/27/72, [REDACTED] United Air Lines furnished the following information:
[REDACTED] advised that he was familiar with [REDACTED] [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] has been on a leave of absence from United Air Lines since July, 1971. [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] employment with United Air Lines [REDACTED] [REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] took the leave of absence because of the fact that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] stated that it was his understanding that [REDACTED] took this leave of absence so that he would not have any es- tablished income so that he would not have [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] advised that he first became familiar with [REDACTED] following the plane crash of the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] advised that it was [REDACTED] who
---
(2) - Seattle 2 - Chicago (Info) 2 - Los Angeles (164-497) (Info) 2 - Las Vegas (Info) 2 - San Francisco LRI/vck (10)
---
164-81-3399 SEARCHED........INDEXED........ SERIALIZED.......FILED........ MAY 9 1972 FBI - SEATTLE
---
Approved: __________________ Sent ___________M Per __________ Special Agent in Charge
---
DB Cooper-8411
SF 164-220 LRI/vck
---
[REDACTED] from Las Vegas, Nevada, to somewhere in Oklahoma, [REDACTED] stated that after [REDACTED] to Oklahoma, in approximately a week or 10 days. [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] following the incident wss extensively questioned and inter- viewed by the Federal Aviation Administration.
---
[REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] original leave of absence was in July of 1971, through January, 1972. [REDACTED] stated that in January, 1972, United Air Lines received a letter from [REDACTED] requesting another six month leave of absence running through June, 1972. [REDACTED] stated that it was an understanding that if [REDACTED] did not come back to work in July, 1972, that his employment with United Air Lines would be terminated. [REDACTED] stated that in [REDACTED] letter in January, 1972, he gave [REDACTED] as the place where all of his mail was to be sent. The address is: [REDACTED]
---
[REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] superior was [REDACTED] United Air Lines, San Francisco International Airport. [REDACTED] advised that possibly [REDACTED] might have some current information on [REDACTED]
---
On 4/27/72, [REDACTED] United Air Lines, San Francisco International Airport, furnished the following informtion
[REDACTED] advised that he has not been contacted by [REDACTED] as far as he knows the last contact by [REDACTED] was the letter received by United Air Lines in January, 1972. [REDACTED] stated that this letter requested an extension of [REDACTED] leave of absence for the next six months running through June, 1972. [REDACTED] advised that additional background information on [REDACTED] could be obtained through the United Air Lines headquarters in Chicago, Illinois. [REDACTED] stated that all personnal records are mainained at the United Air Lines Headquarters in Chicago. [REDACTED] could furnish no further information.
---
On 4/27/72, [REDACTED] FAA, San Francisco Inter- national Airport, furnished the following information:
---
2
DB Cooper-8412
SF 164-220 LRI/vck
---
[REDACTED] advised that all flight crew personnel must take an annual physical so that they may be certified to fly in commercial aircraft. [REDACTED] advised that the license they possess never expires but that the annual physical is needed to keep the license current. [REDACTED] stated that all records maintain by FAA concerning this physical are maintained in their records center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. [REDACTED] stated that the records there will go all the way back to when an individual was first initally employed by an airlines in the capacity of flying commercial planes.
---
[REDACTED] stated that the physicals are usually performed by ones own physican but that within two to four weeks the information would be received by the records center in Oklahoma City. [REDACTED] advised that records would be very complete and one would be able to obtain considerable back- ground information on an individual. [REDACTED] could furnish no further information.
---
No leads are being set out by the San Francisco Division. It is requested that Seattle Division review their file in this matter and all leads are being left to their discretion.
---
b6 b7C
---
3*
DB Cooper-8413
Serials: LA 164-497, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-3399, SF 164-220