To SAC Seattle re Vancouver, Washington directory and records checks on NORJAK subject
Document date 25 May 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-26:212-214
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-26:212-214 Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re Vancouver, Washington directory and records checks on NORJAK subject Id: Cooper-Part-26:212-214 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-26%3A212-214 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 26 pp. 212–214 (DB Cooper-8609–8610), Memo, dated 25 May 1972, serial SE 164-81-3499 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-26%3A212-214
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) DATE: May 25, 1972
FROM : SA [REDACTED]
SUBJECT: NORJACK
Re Portland's airtel to Seattle, d[REDACTED]
---
[REDACTED] b6 SOURCES: [REDACTED] b7C
On January 12, 1972, a review of the 1971 telephone directory for Vancouver, Washington, revealed that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] was assigned telephone number [REDACTED] and resided at [REDACTED] Vancouver, Washington. The telephone directory and the current Polks City Directory for Vancouver, Washington, failed to reveal anything identifiable with [REDACTED] [REDACTED] A further review of the telephone directory revealed a [REDACTED] phone [REDACTED] residence [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Vancouver, Washington.
---
Repeated attempts to contact anyone at [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Vancouver, Washington, were negative during January, 1972.
---
On February 4, 1972, [REDACTED] Vancouver, Washington, advised that [REDACTED] moved from [REDACTED] Vancouver, Washington, on July 21, 1971, leaving no forwarding address. She further advised that [REDACTED] Vancouver, Washington, was occupied by [REDACTED] She added that [REDACTED] resides at [REDACTED]
---
On February 4, 1972, telephone directory assistance for Vancouver, Washington, advised that the phone number [REDACTED] had been disconnected.
---
On February 4, 1972, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Vancouver, Washington, advised that he has never been a skydiver and further does not know anyone by the name of [REDACTED] that is a skydiver.
---
SEARCHED...........INDEXED..... SERIALIZED.........FILED....[initials] MAY 2 5 1972 FBI - SEATTLE
---
NDS:jgm (2)
---
164-81-3499
SE 164-81
---
Repeated attempts to contact anyone at [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Vancouver, Washington, were negative during February, March, and April, 1972.
On May 10, 1972, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Vancouver, Washington, advised he knows [REDACTED] and that [REDACTED] told him that he use to be a skydiver. He added that [REDACTED] just returned from being out of the State of Washington for the last six months as [REDACTED] is a construction worker, and in that job he travels around the country following his work.
Attempts to contact [REDACTED] (supra) were negative until May 16, 1972, when [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] would be available for interview on May 17, 1972.
---
On May 17, 1972, [REDACTED] (supra) advised that he returned to the State of Washington around the first of May, 1972, after being out of the state working in construction jobs since about December, 1971. He advised that he has no idea who the unsub in the instant matter is and further that he can- not recall ever knowing anyone named [REDACTED] stated that he last participated in skydiving activities in 1968 in the Vancouver, Washington, area. [REDACTED] added that a friend of his, [REDACTED] may be able to provide some infor- mation regarding this matter in that [REDACTED] still participates in skydiving activities in the Vancouver, Washington, area. [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] is currently residing with [REDACTED] [REDACTED] name unknown, on [REDACTED] Vancouver, Washington. He then provided a description of [REDACTED] (It should be noted that prior attempts to identify a [REDACTED] in Vancouver, Washington, were negative due to the lack of descriptive data re [REDACTED]).
---
On May 17, 1972, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Vancouver, Washington, phone [REDACTED] advised that she is [REDACTED] and that [REDACTED] and [REDACTED], are currently residing with her during the week and that [REDACTED] generally always return to their home in [REDACTED] Washington, P. O. [REDACTED] on weekends. She further advised that she could not be sure when [REDACTED] would be available for interview at her residence but that he is available to be contacted at his place of employment, [REDACTED] Portland, Oregon, phone [REDACTED] during normal working hours from Monday through Friday. She added that [REDACTED] birthday is in [REDACTED] and that he is currently [REDACTED] White male, 5'9".
---
- 2 -
---
DB Cooper-8609
SE 164-81
On May 18, 1972, [REDACTED], Clark County Sheriff's Office, and [REDACTED] Vancouver, Police Department, caused a search of their records which revealed nothing of a criminal nature identifiable with [REDACTED]
---
LEADS
SEATTLE
AT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
Will review instant file to determine if [REDACTED] should be interviewed, if so set out a lead for Portland to contact him at [REDACTED] phone [REDACTED] Portland, Oregon.
---
- 3 -
DB Cooper-8610
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-3499
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.