SAC Los Angeles to Acting Director re NORJAK suspect and El Segundo interviews

This copy: Part 27 pp. 13–16Also filed at Part 59 pp. 431–434 (primary)

This copy’s own title

SAC Los Angeles to Acting Director re NORJAK suspect interviews and leads

Document date 10 July 1972

Part 27pages 13–164 pagesDB Cooper-8987–8990

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 59 pp. 431–434.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 27, page 13 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-27:013-016

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-27:013-016

Document: Airtel SAC Los Angeles to Acting Director re NORJAK suspect interviews and leads
Id: Cooper-Part-27:013-016
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-27%3A013-016

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 27 pp. 13–16 (DB Cooper-8987–8990), Airtel, dated 10 Jul 1972, serial SE 164-81-3688 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-27%3A013-016

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)

FBI

Date: 7/10/72

Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL AIR MAIL (Priority)

---

TO: ACTING DIRECTOR, FBI (164-2111)

FROM: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497)

RE: NORJAK

OO: Seattle

Re Los Angeles teletype to the Bureau dated 6/30/72.

Re: Suspect [REDACTED] aka [REDACTED]

Copies of this airtel are furnished Knoxville and Phoenix as future investigation may be requested of those divisions if whereabouts of [REDACTED] not positively established during interview of [REDACTED] upon his return from abroad in mid July 1972.

For the information of Knoxville and Phoenix, [REDACTED] white male American, born [REDACTED] has been furnished as possible suspect in this matter.

Investigation at Los Angeles reveals that during mid 1969 one [REDACTED] not further described

---

2 - Bureau (AM) 2 - Indianapolis (164-62) (AM) 2 - Knoxville (AM) 2 - Phoenix (AM) 2 - Salt Lake City (164-24) (AM) 2 - Seattle (164-81) (AM) 2 - Springfield (164-31) (AM) 2 - Los Angeles crs/kah (16)

---

164-81 - 3688 SEARCHED .... INDEXED SERIALIZED / FILED JUL 14 1972 FBI - SEATTLE

---

Approved: [signature] Special Agent in Charge Sent _____ M Per _____ GPO: 1970 O - 405 DB Cooper-8987

LA 164-497

---

[REDACTED] El Segundo, California, was interviewed concerning a fist fight aboard an American Airlines (AAL), plane arriving in Los Angeles. [REDACTED] furnished his occupation as [REDACTED] Wescal Corporation, El Segundo, and was traveling with [REDACTED] El Segundo, described as the [REDACTED] of Wescal Corporation. AUSA, Los Angeles, declined prosecution of the participants in the fracas and no further investigation was conducted.

---

On 7/5/72, [REDACTED] El Segundo, advised [REDACTED] a former shareholder in Wescal Corporation and for about three months during 1969

[REDACTED]

She had spoken with [REDACTED] on numerous occasions while he was [REDACTED] but had no knowledge of his activities after 1969. She observed the artist's conception of the hijacker and advised, in her opinion, the sketch did not resemble [REDACTED]

---

She advised [REDACTED] of Wescal/Corporation are now [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] California, and [REDACTED] might have knowledge concerning [REDACTED]

---

On the same date, [REDACTED] confidentially furnished information from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] is one of the defendants in [REDACTED] U.S. District Court, District of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, case captioned [REDACTED]

[REDACTED]

[REDACTED] added the [REDACTED]. including defendant [REDACTED] is represented in the matter by

[REDACTED] Phoenix, telephone [REDACTED] advised [REDACTED] was not personally known to him and requested his cooperation be kept strictly confidential.

---

On 7/6/72, [REDACTED] El Segundo, advised she was acquainted with both [REDACTED]

---

- 2 -

DB Cooper-8988

LA 164-497

---

[REDACTED] whom she knew as [REDACTED] and the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] She stated [REDACTED] had been a business associate of [REDACTED] She advised [REDACTED] had moved from El Segundo in 1971 and were last known to have resided in Shelbyville, Tennessee, where [REDACTED] is associated with the Bedford Manufacturing Company, telephone b6 [REDACTED] She recalled [REDACTED] was in the Los Angeles b7C area about Thanksgiving of 1971. [REDACTED] added that on prior occasions [REDACTED] had been a guest at their home on Thanksgiving Day, but was not with them on 11/25/71. She recalled he was staying with [REDACTED] in [REDACTED] about that time and although she was not positive, she believed she had heard from unrecalled friends that [REDACTED] at the home of [REDACTED] on Thanksgiving Day 1971. She did not know the address or employment of [REDACTED]

---

She observed the artist's conception of the hijacker and stated in her opinion the drawing did not resemble [REDACTED] b6 [REDACTED] face was much fuller, shorter and broader b7C than the man depicted in the drawing.

---

Intensive daily efforts to contact [REDACTED] or b6 [REDACTED] b7C California, and neighborhood inquiries to ascertain their whereabouts were unproductive. Two vehicles in the parking area of the residence bore California license plates registered to [REDACTED] Lakewood, California, and [REDACTED]

---

On 7/6/72, discreet inquiries in the vicinity of [REDACTED] Lakewood, revealed that [REDACTED] / b6 resided [REDACTED] at this address and that b7C [REDACTED] residing in [REDACTED] It was ascertained that a postcard had been received by [REDACTED] postmarked [REDACTED] from Edinburgh, Scotland, advising that [REDACTED] planned to visit Perth, Glasgow, and fly from London to Boston, U.S.A. on [REDACTED] They planned to return to [REDACTED] It was further ascertained that [REDACTED] was currently on [REDACTED] at an

---

- 3 -

DB Cooper-8989

LA 164-497

---

unknown location and [REDACTED] was on two week vacation visiting relatives in North Carolina.

---

U.S. Postal Inspector's Office, Anaheim, California, advised that [REDACTED] currently receives mail at the address of [REDACTED] California, and no change has been furnished.

---

LEAD

LOS ANGELES

AT [REDACTED] AND LAKEWOOD, CALIFORNIA: Will interview [REDACTED] and conduct all necessary investigation in attempt to positively establish whereabouts of [REDACTED] on 11/24/71.

---

Inasmuch as information developed to date indicates [REDACTED] may well have been in [REDACTED] during pertinent period, no additional leads are being set forth by the Los Angeles Division pending completion of above interviews.

---

ARMED AND DANGEROUS.

---

DB Cooper-8990

---

- 4 -

---

b6 b7C

Serials: 164-2111, 164-31, IP 164-62, LA 164-497, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-3688, SU 164-24