To SAC Seattle re Tide Water Barge Lines employment records on NORJAK suspect
Document date 1 August 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-27:076-077
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-27:076-077 Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re Tide Water Barge Lines employment records on NORJAK suspect Id: Cooper-Part-27:076-077 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-27%3A076-077 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 27 pp. 76–77 (DB Cooper-9050–9051), Memo, dated 1 Aug 1972, serial SE 164-81-3723 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-27%3A076-077
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) DATE: 8/1/72
FROM : SA [redacted]
ELIMINATE
SUBJECT: NORJAK RE: [redacted]
---
On July 25, 1972, [redacted] Tide Water Barge Lines, Six Beach Drive, Vancouver, Washington, caused a search of his records which revealed the following information:
---
Name [redacted] Social Security [redacted] Account No. Address [redacted] Portland, Oregon Phone [redacted] Employed as a [redacted] to approximately [redacted] Guard returned as a deck hand on [redacted] until [redacted] Selective Service V-A Classification Selective Service [redacted] Number Date of Birth [redacted] Race White Sex Male Height 5' 11" Weight 180 pounds Eyes Blue Hair Brown Age [redacted] U. S. Army [redacted] married
---
164-81-3723 SEARCHED___INDEXED___ SERIALIZED___FILED___ AUG 1 1972 [redacted] ILE I N
---
NDS:bgw (2)
---
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan DB Cooper-9050
SE 164-81
---
[REDACTED] further advised that [REDACTED] hired [REDACTED] and that [REDACTED] would return to work on July 26, 1972, at which time he could provide further information regarding [REDACTED]
---
On July 26, 1972, [REDACTED] viewed a composite drawing of the UNSUB after which he advised that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] did not appear to be identical to the composite draw- ing. He further advised that [REDACTED] always wore his hair in a crewcut style and that [REDACTED] was extremely light complexioned.
---
In view of [REDACTED] statement regarding [REDACTED] hair style and complexion along with [REDACTED] not being identi- cal to the composite drawing, it is recommending that no further investigation be conducted regarding [REDACTED]
---
- 2 -
---
DB Cooper-9051
---
b6 b7C
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-3723