Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Springfield re NORJAK comparison
Document date 5 July 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-27:208-208
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-27:208-208 Document: Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Springfield re NORJAK comparison Id: Cooper-Part-27:208-208 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-27%3A208-208 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 27 p. 208 (DB Cooper-9288), Report, dated 5 Jul 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-27%3A208-208
I-336 (Rev. 5-24-72) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Washington, D. C. 20537 REPORT of the IDENTIFICATION DIVISION LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION
YOUR FILE NO. 164-31 FBI FILE NO. 164-2111 LATENT CASE NO. A-45410
July 5, 1972
TO: SAC, Springfield
---
RE: NORJAK
---
REFERENCE: Teletype 6/29/72 EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Springfield SPECIMENS:
This report confirms Butel of 6/29/72.
Previously reported unidentified latent fingerprints [REDACTED - b6/b7C] this case not identical fingerprints [REDACTED - b6/b7C] born [REDACTED - b6/b7C] PD, Santa Monica, California, #50736.
Previously reported latent fingerprints, which were made by the tips, sides or joints of the fingers, and previously re- ported latent impressions, which are either fingerprints or palm prints, compared, insofar as possible, fingerprints this individual, but no identification effected. Complete inked areas of the tips, sides, joints of the fingers and palm prints needed for conclusive comparisons. Palm prints not available our Identification Division files for this individual.
---
1 - Indianapolis 1 - Los Angeles 1 - Salt Lake City (1)- Seattle
---
THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY [stamp partially visible] FBI—SEATTLE DB Cooper-9288
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.