To SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witnesses (9/1/72)
Document date 12 September 1972
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-28:015-016
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-28:015-016 Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witnesses (9/1/72) Id: Cooper-Part-28:015-016 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-28%3A015-016 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 28 pp. 15–16 (DB Cooper-9537–9538), Memo, dated 12 Sep 1972, serial SE 164-81-3891 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-28%3A015-016
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) DATE: 9/12/72
FROM : SA [REDACTED b6/b7C]
SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
---
RE: DEMONSTRATION OF PHOTOGRAPHS TO WITNESSES
On 9/1/72, witness [REDACTED b6/b7C] Seattle, Washington, telephone [REDACTED b6/b7C] was exhibited photographs of the following individuals:
---
NAME SUB FILE NO.
[TABLE CONTENTS REDACTED OR BLANK]
---
164-81-3891 SEARCHED .......... [illegible] SERIALIZED ...[illegible].. FILED ..[illegible] SEP 1 2 1972 FBI-SEATTLE
---
RNN:md (27)
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
DB Cooper-9537
SE 164-81
---
[REDACTED — entire content of box is blank/redacted]
---
With the exception of [REDACTED] stated none of the other individuals bear any resemblance to the hijacker, and in his opinion, are not identical with him. [REDACTED] facial features were similar to the hijacker according to [REDACTED] but he is not identical with the hijacker.
---
b6 b7C
---
2
DB Cooper-9538
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-3891