SAC Denver to SAC Seattle re photograph displayed at Aurora, Colorado, with negative result

Document date 13 October 1972

Part 28page 1951 page

Open in FBI Vault (Part 28, page 195 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-28:195-195

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-28:195-195

Document: Airtel SAC Denver to SAC Seattle re photograph displayed at Aurora, Colorado, with negative result
Id: Cooper-Part-28:195-195
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-28%3A195-195

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 28 p. 195, Airtel, dated 13 Oct 1972, serial SE 164-81-3985 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-28%3A195-195

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)

FBI

Date: 10/13/72

Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL (Priority) ---------------------------------------------------------- TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, DENVER (164-98) (RUC)

SUBJECT: NORJAK

---

Re Minneapolis airtel to Denver, dated 10/2/72.

RE: [REDACTED]

On 10/12/72, [REDACTED] photograph was displayed to [REDACTED] Aurora, Colorado, who advised that [REDACTED] photograph is not identical with the unsub of this case.

---

(2) - Seattle (AM,RM) 1 - Minneapolis (164-73) (AM,RM) 1 - WFO (164-169) (AM,RM) 1 - Denver DLR:crl (5)

---

164-81 - 3985 SEARCHED.......... INDEXED.......... SERIALIZED..✓.. FILED..AC.. OCT 1 6 1972 FBI--SEATTLE

---

Approved: ________[signature]________ Sent __________ M Per ___DB Cooper-9729___ Special Agent in Charge U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1971-413-138

Serials: DN 164-98, MP 164-73, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-3985, WF 164-169