Investigative insert re Spokane, Washington interview on suspect's employment
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-28:213-213
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-28:213-213 Document: Investigative insert re Spokane, Washington interview on suspect's employment Id: Cooper-Part-28:213-213 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-28%3A213-213 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 28 p. 213 (DB Cooper-9748), Report, serial SE 164-81-3995 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-28%3A213-213
SE 164-81 TBW/slb
---
The following investigation was conducted by SA [REDACTED]
AT SPOKANE, WASHINGTON
On September 29, 1972, [REDACTED] Spokane, Washington, advised that [REDACTED] was employed by him as [REDACTED] from about October 1969, until about May 1970. He said that during this time [REDACTED] resided on [REDACTED] and that he was a neighbor of [REDACTED]
---
[REDACTED] stated that he had developed consider- able information concerning [REDACTED] but that he had turned all of this information over to [REDACTED] Postal Inspector from Seattle, Washington, and that he could not recall a great deal of the specifics concerning [REDACTED] at this time. [REDACTED] stated that he recalled that [REDACTED] had gone to the Seattle area after leaving Spokane, and he recalled that he had been in Salt Lake City, Utah, prior to coming to Spokane, Washington.
---
[REDACTED] stated that he would have no idea who might be able to establish the whereabouts of [REDACTED] on November 24, 1971.
---
On October 2, 1972, [REDACTED] Spokane, Washington, advised that [REDACTED] had lived as a neighbor to him [REDACTED] for a few months a couple of years ago, but that he had not gotten to know him well at all. He said that he happened to know that [REDACTED] had been employed as [REDACTED] [REDACTED] but could give no further information relative to him.
---
164-81-3995
---
[illegible stamp text, partially visible]
---
DB Cooper-9748
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-3995
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.