SAC Minneapolis to Acting Director re witness viewing NORJAK composite sketch
Document date 1 December 1972
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-29:012-013
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-29:012-013 Document: Airtel SAC Minneapolis to Acting Director re witness viewing NORJAK composite sketch Id: Cooper-Part-29:012-013 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-29%3A012-013 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 29 pp. 12–13 (DB Cooper-10066–10067), Airtel, dated 1 Dec 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-29%3A012-013
12/1/72
AIRTEL
TO: ACTING DIRECTOR, FBI (164-2111)
FROM: SAC, MINNEAPOLIS (164-73) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK
---
Sub K Cont 2
---
Re Bureau airtel, 11/13/72, to Seattle.
On 11/30/72 revised color sketches were displayed to [REDACTED] Stewardess, Northwest Airlines (NWA), who was aboard Flight 305, 11/24/71; and she advised it is an excellent general likeness of Unknown Subject. This sketch is identified as "B" and dated 11/10/72. She stated the only suggestion she would have is that the nose should be slightly smaller and not as rough or lumpy looking. She also stated that the mouth of the individual she observed on this flight did not appear quite as full, in other words, was "a older looking mouth". She indicated she would define "older mouth" as being very slightly wrinkled around the lips and not having as full an appearance in the lips.
---
On 12/1/72, [REDACTED] NWA, Stewardess, who was also aboard Flight 305, stated that she believed sketch "B" is more similar to the appearance of Unknown Subject than the earlier black and white and colored sketches. She stated that in her opinion, however, the current sketch was not a vivid presentation of the appearance of Unknown Subject. She did note that she observed the Unknown Subject from the side and never did see a full-face view of him.
---
2 - Bureau 2 - Seattle (164-81) 2 - Minneapolis RWG:kao (6)
[Stamps and handwritten notations] SERIALIZED... FILED... DEC 4 1972
---
DB Cooper-10066
MP 164-73
---
She concluded by stating she would not be able to suggest any alterations or changes in the most recent sketch.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
---
DB Cooper-10067