To SAC Seattle re NORJAK claims at Fort Lewis, Washington

Document date 14 December 1972

Part 29page 941 pageDB Cooper-10160

Open in FBI Vault (Part 29, page 94 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-29:094-094

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-29:094-094

Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re NORJAK claims at Fort Lewis, Washington
Id: Cooper-Part-29:094-094
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-29%3A094-094

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 29 p. 94 (DB Cooper-10160), Memo, dated 14 Dec 1972, serial SE 164-81-420 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-29%3A094-094

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum

TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) DATE: 12/14/72

FROM : SA [REDACTED] Su₂ DQ

SUBJECT: NORJAK

---

Re memo of Special Agent THOMAS J. MANNING dated 11/17/72.

AT FORT LEWIS, WASHINGTON

On 11/28/72, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, advised that as a result of the various claims that occurred from the activity of the third armored cavalry Division he had been in contact with the United States Army Claims Service, Fort George Meade, Maryland, who in turn had contacted the Department of Justice in Washington D.C. which resulted in the following as the procedure in handling the above claims:

---

Because of Posse Comitatis the Army felt that they could not pay the claims as there was some question whether they should have been involved in the search activity. They agreed, however, to receive all of the claims, negotiate for a settlement, and upon determining the amount involved would notify the Justice Department who would pay the claim. He advised, however, that he had not received a claim from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] He stated, however, that in view of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] letter there would be less delay if he would contact the Corps of Engineers himself and see if they would not rectify the wrong presented by [REDACTED] without a formal claim.

---

On 12/6/72, [REDACTED] telephonically advised that the Corps of Engineers was receptive to sending a grader to the [REDACTED] property and he felt that the arrangements could be made within the next two weeks. He will continue to pursue this matter.

---

SEARCHED ......INDEXED...... SERIALIZED....FILED.... DEC 14 1972 FBI — SEATTLE

---

(2) - Seattle JAG/rse (2)

Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan DB Cooper-10160

Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-420

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.