SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re informant photo identification at Imperial, California

Document date 29 December 1972

Part 29page 2051 pageDB Cooper-10287

Open in FBI Vault (Part 29, page 205 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-29:205-205

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-29:205-205

Document: Memo SAC San Diego to SAC Seattle re informant photo identification at Imperial, California
Id: Cooper-Part-29:205-205
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-29%3A205-205

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 29 p. 205 (DB Cooper-10287), Memo, dated 29 Dec 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-29%3A205-205

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum

TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) DATE: 12/29/72

FROM : [signature] SAC, SAN DIEGO (164-91)

SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: Seattle Bufile 164-2111

RE: [redacted] Re Seattle airtel to San Diego dated 11/3/72 164-81-1a (367)

---

Enclosed for Seattle is one photograph of [redacted] taken 8/25/72.

AT IMPERIAL, CALIFORNIA

On 12/11/72, [redacted] who has been cooperative in the past, advised upon viewing a picture of [redacted] [redacted]

[redacted] further advised that [redacted] and [redacted] have lived at [redacted] Brawley, California, for approximately ten years. [redacted] advised that he would make inquiries to determine if [redacted] had left Brawley, California, during November 1971.

On 12/12/72, [redacted] advised that he had determined through [redacted] and through [redacted] had been in Brawley, California, during the entire month of November 1971. [redacted] advised that due to an automobile accident which had occurred prior to November 1971, [redacted] [redacted] also advised that [redacted] drinks heavily.

In view of the foregoing, [redacted] is considered not to be identical to the subject of captioned case.

---

(2) - Seattle (Enc.1) ELIMINATE SERIALIZED [stamp] FILED [stamp] 2 - San Diego JAN 3 1973 TB/gar(4) DB-Cooper-10287

Serials: 164-2111, SD 164-91, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-1A, SE 164-81-4266