SAC Alexandria to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, Pentagon inquiry on reimbursable military project (AX 164-72)
Document date 8 February 1973
Also filed separately as sections:
- SAC Alexandria to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, Pentagon inquiry (file copy)
- SAC Alexandria to SAC Seattle re Pentagon military route inquiry
- SAC Alexandria to SAC Seattle re Pentagon inquiry on military flight re-routing
- SAC Alexandria to SAC Seattle re Pentagon inquiry on military aerial photography
- SAC Alexandria to SAC Seattle re continuing Pentagon investigation
- SAC Alexandria to SAC Seattle re negative Pentagon investigation
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-30:049-050
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-30:049-050 Document: Airtel SAC Alexandria to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, Pentagon inquiry on reimbursable military project (AX 164-72) Id: Cooper-Part-30:049-050 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-30%3A049-050 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 30 pp. 49–50 (DB Cooper-10686–10687), Airtel, dated 8 Feb 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-30%3A049-050
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 2/8/73
Transmit the following in ______________________ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via __AIRTEL__ (Priority)
---
Su[illegible] [illegible] 3 [guess: Cor] X
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, ALEXANDRIA (164-72) (P)
NORJAK (OO:SE)
Re WFO letter to Alexandria, 11/20/72; and Seattle airtel to Alexandria, 2/5/73.
Continuous investigation has been conducted at the Pentagon, Arlington, Virginia, during the months of December, 1972, and January, 1973, in an attempt to determine who would have authority to re-route military training missions in visual aerial photography flown within the continental United States. To date no one has been located who could positively state that this could be done, however, [REDACTED] was contacted and he advised that he had made inquiry into this matter and stated that in the event Seattle wished to have military assistance in this matter than Seattle should request the Director to submit a letter of request to the Special Assistant to the Secretary of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Pentagon, Washington, D. C. 20301. In this letter the full particulars of the matter should be set forth as well as whether or not the Bureau or Department of Justice is willing to observe the additional cost if any to the Air Force. [REDACTED] advised that he
---
164-81-4/26 SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED __SE__ FILED __X__ FEB 1 9 1973 FBI - SEATTLE
---
(2) Seattle 2-Alexandria KRF:mew (4)
---
Approved: CDB/[signature] Special Agent in Charge
Sent _________ M Per _________
DB Cooper-10686 U.S. Government Printing Office: 1972 — 455-574
---
b6 b7C b6 b7C
AX 164-72
---
could not state positively that the request would be granted, however, advised that it was his opinion that if this were to be a reimbursable project, that it would probably receive more favorable action. However, in any event, upon receipt of the letter a conference would be held within the appropriate military organization to ascertain the feasibility of such missions and the Bureau would be properly notified.
---
-2-
---
DB Cooper-10687