SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re possible NORJACK suspect found in unrelated file review
Document date 28 March 1973
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-30:330-330
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-30:330-330 Document: Airtel SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re possible NORJACK suspect found in unrelated file review Id: Cooper-Part-30:330-330 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-30%3A330-330 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 30 p. 330 (DB Cooper-10998), Airtel, dated 28 Mar 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-30%3A330-330
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 3/28/73
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL AIR MAIL ___________________________________ (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, LAS VEGAS (164-60) (P) SUBJECT: NORJACK 11/24/71 CCA - HIJACKING; EXTORTION OO: Seattle
---
In a file review on another matter [REDACTED] attempting to identify a [REDACTED] it was noted in [REDACTED] that subject, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] FBI # [REDACTED] described as having a tattoo on right forearm [REDACTED] born [REDACTED] described in 1966 as 5'9", 160 lbs., dark brown hair, brown/green eyes. [REDACTED] in Reno, Portland, Los Angeles, San Mateo, Redwood City and Las Vegas. [REDACTED] directed letter dated 3/30/71, to Las Vegas SA with return address of [REDACTED] Fairfield, California, stating that on [REDACTED] he was to go to the "federal office" in Sacramento on an Interstate Flight Warrant.
---
In view of tattoo, description and [REDACTED] [REDACTED] this information submitted for consideration as suspect since it is not known by Las Vegas if [REDACTED] was previously eliminated as suspect or incarcerated as of 11/24/71. Further attention being left to discretion of OO.
---
2 - Seattle 1 - Sacramento (INFO) 1 - Las Vegas JLS:kf (4)
---
164-81- [guess: 5569] [illegible] [guess: Agents] [illegible] SPN 91971
---
Approved: _____________ Sent __________ M Per __________ Special Agent in Charge DB Cooper-10998
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.