SAC New York to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect interview and palm prints

Document date 5 June 1973

Part 31pages 240–2412 pagesDB Cooper-11491–11492

Open in FBI Vault (Part 31, page 240 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-31:240-241

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-31:240-241

Document: Airtel SAC New York to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect interview and palm prints
Id: Cooper-Part-31:240-241
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-31%3A240-241

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 31 pp. 240–241 (DB Cooper-11491–11492), Airtel, dated 5 Jun 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-31%3A240-241

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)

FBI

Date: 6/5/73

Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code) AIRTEL Via ___________ (Priority)

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, NEW YORK (164-627) (RUC)

SUBJECT: [REDACTED] NORJAK (OO:SEATTLE)

---

ReNY airtel to Seattle, dated 5/1/73; Seattle airtel to NY, dated 5/3/73.

Enclosed herewith for the Seattle Division are - nine copies of an FD-302 setting forth the results of inter- view with [REDACTED] on 5/31/73, at Ardsley, New York.

It is noted [REDACTED] was extremely cooperative with interviewing Special Agents; however, he did on several occas- ions question how his name was supplied to the FBI with regard to this matter. He was told only that it was furnished in the course of official business and that the FBI was not at liberty to supply the exact source of the information.

[REDACTED] resides in a [REDACTED] area of Westchester County, New York, and [REDACTED] and environment appeared in line with his past and present position of employ- ment.

Based on information available and results of inter- view, New York is of the opinion additional investigation such as verification of [REDACTED] whereabouts on 11/24/71, through

---

2-Seattle (Encls. 9) (RM) 1-New York

AJD:mcb (4)

---

[STAMP] [partially legible] FILED JUN [?] 1973

---

Approved: [signature] Special Agent in Charge

DB Cooper-11491 Sent __________ M Per __________ *U.S.Government Printing Office: 1972 - 455-574

NY 164-627

---

contact with his employer or taking of palm prints is not warranted at this time. It is noted [REDACTED] indicated no aversion to either his employment records being verified or his having to submit to palm prints.

---

A search by [REDACTED] in the presence of interviewing Special Agents, of his personal effects failed to produce a photograph of himself which was suitable for displaying to witnesses. All photos located by him were of the general family, snapshop type, all with the camera being to far from the subject to depict facial features clearly. It is noted, however, based on personal observation, [REDACTED] very closely resembles photo submitted to Seattle via New York airtel dated 2/28/73, with the exception that his hair is now some- what longer, and his face slightly fuller.

---

UAC, New York anticipates no further investigation in this matter re [REDACTED]

---

b6 b7C

---

-2-

---

DB Cooper-11492

Serials: NY 164-627, SE 164-81