Seattle Police Department follow-up report re forged check, occurrence 10/1/71

Part 31pages 276–2772 pagesDB Cooper-11532–11533

Open in FBI Vault (Part 31, page 276 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-31:276-277

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-31:276-277

Document: Seattle Police Department follow-up report re forged check, occurrence 10/1/71
Id: Cooper-Part-31:276-277
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-31%3A276-277

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 31 pp. 276–277 (DB Cooper-11532–11533), Form — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-31%3A276-277

FOLLOW-UP REPORT [STAMP: RECORDS BUREAU] SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT PRESENT DATE: [redacted] CASE NUMBER: [redacted] DATE OF OCCURRENCE: Oct. 1, 1971 EVIDENCE NUMBER: [redacted] UNIT FILE NUMBER: [redacted] REPORTED AS: [blank] LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: [blank] CORRES. NUMBER: [blank] ADDRESS: [blank] PHONE: [blank]

CLEARED (ARREST—UNFOUNDED—REFERRAL JUVENILE CT.—EXCEPTIONAL CLEARANCE); AT LARGE WARRANT: ETC. ION: Inactive.

ITY: RECOVERED [ ] ADDITIONAL STOLEN [ ] FURTHER DESCRIPTION [ ] INDICATE 10 MARKS—COLORS—SIZES— SERIAL NUMBERS—DISPOSITION—VALUE, ETC AS FIRST ENTRY BELOW.

SUSPECTS: INCLUDE NAMES, B/A NUMBERS, DESCRIPTIONS, DISPOSITION, CAN VICTIM IDENTIFY, ETC. GENERAL: SUMMARIZE STEPS OF INVESTIGATION- INCLUDE PERSONS INTERVIEWED, ADD'L WITNESSES, RESULTS OF INTERROGATIONS, EVIDENCE, BUSINESS ADDRESSES AND PHONES, ETC. CASE M.O.: INDICATE ADD'L M.O. FACTORS NOT INCLUDED ON OFFENSE REPORT.

---

[in]dex as [redacted]

18-72 Assigned case by [redacted]

Old case, 2nd. person check who could have accepted the signed check and is him- self a victim of the true forger. Called SPD B/R and found several [redacted] in records. One individual, [redacted] has a Local [redacted] might be same person who is 2nd. signature this check. Looked at 1970 case [redacted] and find this same individual, except he shows a [redacted] instead of [redacted] Local request sent SPD Photo lab.

-28-72 Called Old Nat'l bank, Mu.2-7800 and learned the [redacted] [redacted] was out and would not be back until later today.

31-72 Called Welfare office, investigations-phone 464-6675 and reported SPD had this check signed by [redacted] n warrant number [redacted] and dated [redacted] (July). They will call back.

-31-72 Received Affidavit of Forgery signed by [redacted] & Notarized

Case inactive

-2-72 Welfare Investigations called back to report that [redacted] had reported this check stolen several months ago. DB Cooper-11532

No suspects, case inactive, Suspect passer is described as [redacted]

---

SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED [checkmark] FILED -/4- [guess: had] reported FBI—SEATTLE [initials/date]

---

4/7 79 16C1-81-[illegible]

---

DATA PROCESSING

SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT

CASE NUMBER: [redacted]

CONTINUATION SHEET (1) OFFENSE AND ARREST (3) TRAFFIC INCIDENT (2) FOLLOW-UP CASE SUMMARY

ACCIDENT NUMBER: [blank] UNIT FILE NO.: [blank] CORRES. NUMBER: [blank] B/A NUMBER: [blank]

---

[blank / redacted]

---

b6 b7C

---

DB Cooper-11533

Serials: 16C1-81-[illegible]