Seattle PD Follow-Up Report re forgery at National Bank, 3rd & Pine
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-31:279-279
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-31:279-279 Document: Seattle PD Follow-Up Report re forgery at National Bank, 3rd & Pine Id: Cooper-Part-31:279-279 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-31%3A279-279 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 31 p. 279 (DB Cooper-11535), Form — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-31%3A279-279
FOLLOW-UP REPORT SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
STATE: [blank] BULL. [blank] ASS'L [redacted] FILE [blank] NT OTHER
PRESENT DATE: [redacted] CASE NUMBER: (see below)
CASE: on/Forged DATE OF OCCURRENCE: [illegible] EVIDENCE NUMBER: [blank] UNIT FILE NUMBER: [blank]
LLY REPORTED AS: [blank] LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: 3rd & Pine CORRES. NUMBER: [blank]
ADDRESS: National Bank same PHONE: MU 2 7800
CLEARED (ARREST—UNFOUNDED—REFERRAL JUVENILE CT.—EXCEPTIONAL CLEARANCE); AT LARGE WARRANT: ETC. DISPOSITION: INACTIVI
PROPERTY: RECOVERED □ ADDITIONAL STOLEN □ FURTHER DESCRIPTION □ INDICATE ID MARKS—COLORS—SIZES— SERIAL NUMBERS—DISPOSITION—VALUE, ETC. AS FIRST ENTRY BELOW.
---
COMMENCE EACH ENTRY WITH A NUMBER AND THE DATE AND TIME SUSPECTS: INCLUDE NAMES, B/A NUMBERS, DESCRIPTIONS, DISPOSITION, CAN VICTIM IDENTIFY, ETC. GENERAL: SUMMARIZE STEPS OF INVESTIGATION; INCLUDE PERSONS INTERVIEWED, ADD'L WITNESSES, RESULTS OF INTERROGATIONS, EVIDENCE, BUSINESS ADDRESSES AND PHONES, ETC. CASE M.O.: INDICATE ADD'L M.O. FACTORS NOT INCLUDED ON OFFENSE REPORT.
---
Do not list as suspect " " " " " "
[redacted] 1100 hrs. Assigned following cases for investigation:
[redacted] Old Nat'l. Bank, 3rd & Pine [redacted] [redacted] Old Nat'l. Bank, 3rd & Pine [redacted]
B/R [redacted] [redacted]
This case inactivated because there is no known suspect; these two checks were payable to two females, [redacted] yet the bank teller cashed both checks on the same day, for a male about 35 yrs. old who didn't even endorse them correctly, in fact, he signed [redacted] on both checks. In the opinion of this investigator it was an extremely careless act.
---
164-81-[redacted]
DB Cooper-11535
---
b6 b7C
Serials: SE 164-81