File copy of memo re University of Washington HUB ransom money lead (serial 164-81-4788)
Document date 11 June 1973
Part of: To SAC Seattle re UW HUB student allegedly holding Cooper ransom money
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-31:298-298
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-31:298-298 Document: File copy of memo re University of Washington HUB ransom money lead (serial 164-81-4788) Id: Cooper-Part-31:298-298 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-31%3A298-298 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 31 p. 298 (DB Cooper-11556), Memo, dated 11 Jun 1973, serial SE 164-81-47988 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-31%3A298-298
SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)(P) 6/11/73
SA [REDACTED]
NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
RE: [REDACTED]
---
On August 22, 1972, [REDACTED] telephonically advised that while having lunch at the University of Wash- ington HUB, he conversed with a male student at the Univer- sity, [REDACTED] which were part of the ransom money.
---
Through logical investigation, the name [REDACTED] [REDACTED] was developed. A copy of [REDACTED] driver's license in the State of Washington was obtained from the Department of Motor Vehicles, Olympia, Washington.
---
On January 11, 1973, [REDACTED] was interviewed at the University of Oregon Law School and was shown a photograph of [REDACTED] stated after viewing the photograph at length, that [REDACTED] strongly resembles the individual who claimed to have found part of the D. B. COOPER ransom money, [REDACTED]. [REDACTED] stated he could not be positive that [REDACTED] is identical to the unidentified individual claiming to have found part of the ransom money, however, he definitely bears a very strong resemblance.
---
Investigation has determined that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
---
The following is a description of [REDACTED]
---
164-81-47988 SEARCHED..........INDEXED........ SERIALIZED.....[check]..FILED......[check]... JUN 1 1 1973
---
(3) - Seattle RNN:kn (3)
DB Cooper-11556
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-47988
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.