SAC Denver to SAC Cleveland re NORJAK subject, transmitting records results

Document date 20 June 1973

Part 32page 451 pageDB Cooper-11642

Also filed at: Part 32 p. 65 · Part 116 p. 227

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 32, page 45 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-32:045-045

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-32:045-045

Document: Airtel SAC Denver to SAC Cleveland re NORJAK subject, transmitting records results
Id: Cooper-Part-32:045-045
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-32%3A045-045

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 32 p. 45 (DB Cooper-11642), Airtel, dated 20 Jun 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-32%3A045-045

6/20/73

---

AIRTEL AIRMAIL, REGISTERED

TO: SAC, CLEVELAND (164-88)

FROM: SAC, DENVER (164-208)(RUC)

SUBJECT: [REDACTED b6/b7C]

OO: CLEVELAND [REDACTED b6/b7C]

Re St. Louis letter to Cleveland, 6/6/73.

---

On 6/18/73, Personnel Command Section, Air Reserve Personnel Center, Denver, Colorado, advised they could not locate a military file for the subject by SSAN or Air Force Serial Number. They further advised their rosters for the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Missouri, the Air National Guard, and Air Force Active Duty Personnel are all negative re [REDACTED b6/b7C]

---

(2) - Cleveland (AM,RM) 2 - Denver (1 - 164-208) (1 - 164-98) DLR:rlh (4)

---

[handwritten] 164-81- [illegible] [stamp] [illegible] JUI [guess: 1973] DB Cooper-11642

Serials: 164-208, CV 164-88, DN 164-98, SE 164-81