SAC Richmond to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect eliminated by fingerprints
Document date 7 August 1973
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-32:183-184
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-32:183-184 Document: Airtel SAC Richmond to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect eliminated by fingerprints Id: Cooper-Part-32:183-184 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-32%3A183-184 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 32 pp. 183–184 (DB Cooper-11793–11794), Airtel, dated 7 Aug 1973, serial SE 164-81-4902 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-32%3A183-184
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 8/7/73
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL (Priority) --------------------------------------------------
---
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM : SAC, RICHMOND (164-74) - RUC - [REDACTED]
SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO: SEATTLE)
---
Re Seattle airtel to Richmond, 8/1/73. RE: [REDACTED]
On 7/18/73, Virginia State Police [REDACTED] advised SA [REDACTED] that an informant [REDACTED] whom he wished to keep anonymous, felt that [REDACTED] employed somewhere in the Fincastle, Va. area, could possibly be the subject in captioned matter. [REDACTED] was interested in receiving a photograph of the artist's conception of D. D. COOPER, the subject in this case.
[REDACTED] continually stated [REDACTED] informant's fear of compromise was great and therefore did not want the Agent to [REDACTED] SA [REDACTED] made a telephone call to [REDACTED] Latent Fingerprint Section of the Identification Division, and requested that the fingerprints of [REDACTED] which were on file, be compared with those latents developed in instant matter.
---
(2) - Seattle 1 - Richmond DMC:lsw (3)
Approved: [signature] Special Agent in Charge Sent _________ M Per _________
U.S. Government Printing Office: 1972 — 455-574
[STAMPS:] SEARCHED ......INDEXED........ SERIALIZED...[checked]..FILED...[checked]... AUG 1 0 1973
164-81 - 4902
DB Cooper-11793
RH 164-74
---
On 7/19/73, [REDACTED] telephonically advised the Richmond Division that the fingerprints on file for [REDACTED] were not identical to those of the latents obtained in this matter. This information was immediately furnished to [REDACTED].
[REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] As a result of this [REDACTED] stated that he was able to determine that there is absolutely no similarities in facial features between [REDACTED] and the artist's conception of COOPER. [REDACTED] was also able to determine that [REDACTED] is a non-smoker and possesses none of the characteristics contributed to COOPER by witnesses.
The identity of [REDACTED] as furnished by [REDACTED] describes him as a white male, 5' 10", blue eyes, brown hair, born [REDACTED].
Inasmuch as neither fingerprints nor physical characteristics of [REDACTED] match those of COOPER, no further action is being taken by the Richmond Division in this matter.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
---
2*
---
DB Cooper-11794
Serials: RH 164-74, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-4902