FBI Laboratory report to SAC Dallas re TWABOM typewriting, paper and envelope comparison (Lab D-731220011 JB)

Document date 3 January 1974

Part 33pages 214–2152 pagesDB Cooper-12318–12319

Also filed at: Part 66 pp. 151–152

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 33, page 214 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-33:214-215

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-33:214-215

Document: FBI Laboratory report to SAC Dallas re TWABOM typewriting, paper and envelope comparison (Lab D-731220011 JB)
Id: Cooper-Part-33:214-215
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-33%3A214-215

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 33 pp. 214–215 (DB Cooper-12318–12319), Report, dated 3 Jan 1974 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-33%3A214-215

Laboratory Transmittal Form F-72

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

---

To: SAC, Dallas [REDACTED]

Date: January 3, 1974

Sub G [handwritten]

From: Director, FBI Re: TWABOM

FBI File No. [REDACTED] b6 b7C Lab. No. D-731220011 JB

---

Examination requested by: Dallas

Reference: Airtel dated 12/11/73

Examination requested: Document - Fingerprint

Remarks:

---

[handwritten] 7 CC

---

[REDACTED] case mentioned in the attached report has Bufile [REDACTED] Portland file [REDACTED] case mentioned in the attached report has Bufile [REDACTED] Seattle file [REDACTED]

The results of the latent fingerprint comparisons requested will be handled separately. [REDACTED]

As stated in Laboratory report to Portland dated 11/30/72, in connection with [REDACTED] case, the lack of comparable writings prevented a definite opinion being reached as to whether any of the hand printing on Q15 in [REDACTED] case was or was not prepared by the same person or persons who prepared items in [REDACTED] case. Inasmuch as the material submitted in [REDACTED] case was not photographed, it will be necessary to resubmit this material should further comparisons be desired.

---

Enclosures (2) (2 Lab report) 1 - New York [REDACTED] - Enclosure (Lab report) (1)- Seattle (164-81) - Enclosure (Lab report) /u [illegible] 1 - Portland [REDACTED] - Enclosure (Lab report) 3 - Dallas (164-[guess: 151]) - Enclosures (S[illegible] Lab [illegible] INDEXED) SERIALIZED [illegible] FILED [illegible] ADMINISTRATIVE PAGE JAN 7 1974

---

[handwritten] 11-4- 81-6052

DB Cooper-12318

REPORT of the FBI LABORATORY

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

To: SAC, Dallas [REDACTED] Date: January 3, 1974 FBI File No. [REDACTED] Re: TWABOM Lab. No. D-73122011 JB

---

[REDACTED] Request received 12/19/73

Request intercomparison of material in TWABOM case with material in [REDACTED] case and material in [REDACTED] case with material in [REDACTED] case.

Result of examination:

It was determined that the typewriting, paper, and envelope comprising the questioned evidence in the TWABOM case are different from the typewriting, paper, and envelopes comprising the questioned evidence submitted in [REDACTED] case.

The material received in [REDACTED] case was previously compared with the material received in [REDACTED] case with negative results.

---

b6 b7C

---

DB Cooper-12319

Serials: SE 164-81