SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect, no pertinent information in Las Vegas file
Document date 7 January 1974
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-33:260-261
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-33:260-261 Document: Airtel SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect, no pertinent information in Las Vegas file Id: Cooper-Part-33:260-261 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-33%3A260-261 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 33 pp. 260–261 (DB Cooper-12392–12393), Airtel, dated 7 Jan 1974, serial SE 164-81-6063 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-33%3A260-261
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 1/7/74
Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, LAS VEGAS (164-60) (P)
NORJAK (OO:SE)
Re SE airtels to LV 12/27/73, re suspects [REDACTED] LNU [REDACTED]
Re: [REDACTED]
---
On 12/2/71, [REDACTED] Carson City, Nevada, advised that [REDACTED] went out of business over four years ago and [REDACTED] Carson City, Nevada. [REDACTED] advised he did not have anybody as a partner named [REDACTED] and he does not recall anyone work- ing for him with that name. He explained that he had many employees who worked for a short period of time and does not have any records of that operation.
---
This information was inadvertently not furnished to Seattle, however, was furnished to Portland, in Las Vegas teletype to Portland dated 12/2/71.
---
Re: [REDACTED]
Seattle is requested to furnish Las Vegas informa- tion as to where your office obtained the information of the identity of the address of [REDACTED] Reno, Nevada, and to the information that [REDACTED] whose last name is possibly [REDACTED] This information is being requested by the Las Vegas Division in order that the requested investigation in re airtel can properly be conducted.
---
(2) - Seattle 1 - Las Vegas
WDJ:can (3)
Approved: ___________ Sent ___________ M___Per ___ [signature] Special Agent in Charge
[STAMP: SEARCHED___ INDEXED___ SERIALIZED___ FILED___ JAN 1 1 1974 [illegible] SEATTLE]
[Handwritten: 164-81-6063]
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: DB Cooper-12392
LV 164-60
A review of the Las Vegas file does not reflect the above information pertaining to subject [REDACTED]
---
b6 b7C
---
2 DB Cooper-12393
Serials: LV 164-60, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-6063