SA to SAC Seattle re FCC contact, Seattle (file copy)
Document date 19 February 1974
Part of: SA to SAC Seattle re FCC contact concerning Bellingham/Tacoma lead
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-33:424-424
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-33:424-424 Document: Memo SA to SAC Seattle re FCC contact, Seattle (file copy) Id: Cooper-Part-33:424-424 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-33%3A424-424 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 33 p. 424 (DB Cooper-12563), Memo, dated 19 Feb 1974 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-33%3A424-424
SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) 2/19/74
SA [REDACTED] b6 b7C NORJAK CO: SEATTLE
RE: [REDACTED]
---
Re Los Angeles airtel to Seattle, 11/9/73.
On 1/9/74, [REDACTED] Federal Communications Commission, 009 First Avenue, Seattle, Washington, telephone [REDACTED] was contacted concerning this matter. [REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] further advised that Complaints and Compliance Commission [REDACTED] but not the FCC in Seattle. [REDACTED] stated the Complaints and Compliance Commission could be contacted through the Broadcast Bureau, part of the FCC in Washington, D.C.
[REDACTED] further advised that [REDACTED] b6 b7C the Bellingham National Bank Building, Bellingham, Washington. [REDACTED] stated his records indicated that [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] b6 Bellingham, Washington b7C [REDACTED] telephone [REDACTED] stated that his FCC records did not indicate an owner by the name [REDACTED] as being associated with [REDACTED] associated with [REDACTED] in Bellingham, Washington.
---
4-Seattle (164-81) RMH:dlm (4)
[handwritten: 16 4 8/- [illegible]]
SEARCHED ......INDEXED ...... SERIALIZED ......FILED ...... FEB 19 1974 FBI-SEATTLE
DB Cooper-12563
Serials: SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.