SAC Miami to SAC Seattle re Cutler Ridge witness interviews
Document date 29 March 1974
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-34:108-109
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-34:108-109 Document: Airtel SAC Miami to SAC Seattle re Cutler Ridge witness interviews Id: Cooper-Part-34:108-109 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-34%3A108-109 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 34 pp. 108–109 (DB Cooper-12714–12715), Airtel, dated 29 Mar 1974, serial SE 164-81-618 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-34%3A108-109
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 3/29/74
Transmit the following in _______ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL _______ (Priority)
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (Sub. 338) FROM: SAC, MIAMI (164-552) (RUC) RE: NORJAK (OO:SEATTLE)
RE: [REDACTED]
---
Re Miami airtel to Seattle 12/6/73.
On 2/12/74, [REDACTED] Cutler Ridge, Fla., advised she recalled [REDACTED] who lived at [REDACTED] 4 or 5 years ago.
[REDACTED] viewed artist's conception drawings of the unsub in this case showing him both with and without glasses. She advised that these drawings bore no resemblance to him in any respect. She added that [REDACTED] was a sedentary type, had a large protruding paunch, although he was not a stocky person, and had a fair complexion. She was unable to say where he is now located.
On 3/25/74, [REDACTED] advised he recalled [REDACTED] quite well. He stated that the drawings of the unsub do not have anything in common with the appearance of [REDACTED]. He said [REDACTED] was over 50% bald and had almost totally white hair. He was of very fair complexion. He gave the impression of being flabby physically and had poor posture.
[REDACTED] had no knowledge of [REDACTED] current location.
---
(2) - Seattle 1 - Miami NEB:ggr (3)
[handwritten] /64-81-618/ [stamps and handwritten notations, partially illegible]
Approved: _______ Special Agent in Charge Sent _______ M Per _______ DB Cooper-12714 U.S. Government Printing Office: 1972 — 455-574
MM 164-552
---
On 3/28/74, it was determined from the [REDACTED] Dade County License Bureau, Miami, that [REDACTED] and has never had one in Miami.
From a review of background information and descriptions obtained concerning [REDACTED] in the Miami area, there is nothing to indicate that he is the unsub or is even slightly similar to him in appearance. It is believed that the results of the three interviews conducted of persons who knew [REDACTED] provide no logical reason to make further efforts to locate him.
It is being left to the discretion of the office of origin as to whether to display his photo, which was enclosed with reairtel, to witnesses.
No further investigation is being conducted concerning [REDACTED] in Miami.
---
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
-2-
---
DB Cooper-12715
---
b6 b7C
Serials: MM 164-552, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-618