SAC Seattle to Director re NORJAK suspect and proposed polygraph
Document date 30 September 1974
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-34:367-369
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-34:367-369 Document: Airtel SAC Seattle to Director re NORJAK suspect and proposed polygraph Id: Cooper-Part-34:367-369 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-34%3A367-369 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 34 pp. 367–369 (DB Cooper-13011–13013), Airtel, dated 30 Sep 1974, serial SE 164-81-6321 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-34%3A367-369
9/30/74
---
AIRTEL AIRMAIL
TO : DIRECTOR, FBI (164-2111) [REDACTED] FROM : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) [REDACTED]
SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
Re: [REDACTED]
---
On 6/11/74, [REDACTED] Seattle, Washington, telephone [REDACTED] was interviewed in the presence of his attorney, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Seattle, Washington. [REDACTED] stated he had some information concerning the "D.B. COOPER" case.
[REDACTED] advised that sometime in late November, 1971, or early December, 1971, Seattle Attorney [REDACTED] met him [REDACTED] Seattle, Washington, at approximately 10:30 PM. and requested that he [REDACTED] [REDACTED] identified as the perpetrator of the D.B. COOPER hijacking.
[REDACTED] made available a [REDACTED] [REDACTED] in the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] because [REDACTED]
stated he made some calls in order to obtain help for the [REDACTED] but was unable to find anybody to help him. [REDACTED] advised he contacted [REDACTED] by phone at approximately 12:00 PM on the same night, and told him that he would not be able to do as he [REDACTED] had asked.
[REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] provided by [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
---
3 - Bureau (2 - 164-2111) (1 - ATTN: FBI Laboratory - Polygraph Unit [REDACTED] 3 - Seattle (2 - 164-81) (1- [REDACTED] MM:sra \(6) DB Cooper-13011 / 6 4 - 8 1 - 6 3 2 1
---
b6 b7C b7D
SE 164-81
---
[redacted] advised that [redacted] that [redacted] had D.E. COOPER [redacted] and brought to Seattle, Washington, as according to [redacted] Seattle would be the last place anyone would look for him. [redacted] further advised [redacted] for D.B. COOPER to stay [redacted]
---
[redacted] advised [redacted] that he had met "D.B. COOPER" [redacted] on that night, and had [redacted] [redacted] was unknown to [redacted]
---
[redacted] stated that [redacted] the D. B. COOPER ransom money for the individual identified as D.B. COOPER. [redacted]
---
On 8/29/74, [redacted] Homicide Division S.M., LAPD, advised that [redacted] by the Los Angeles Police Department on [redacted] of Los Angeles. [redacted] stated his records indicate [redacted]
---
On 9/4/74, [redacted] attorney, [redacted] advised [redacted] but would be willing to answer questions during a polygraph examination [redacted] 1974.
---
[redacted] would be the person afforded a polygraph examination if Bureau authority is received. [redacted] has no known physical or mental disability or any other factor which would bear on his being given a polygraph exam. The following is the description of [redacted] obtained through observation and interviews:
Name: [redacted] Sex: Male Race: Negro D.O.B. [redacted]
---
DB Cooper-13012
SE 164-81
Height: 6' Weight: 190 lbs. Age: Approximately 39 Address: [REDACTED] Seattle, Washington
---
A polygraph examination to determine if [REDACTED] is telling the complete truth would save considerable time, effort, and money in investigation necessary to disprove [REDACTED] story. [REDACTED] has requested that Seattle Attorney, [REDACTED] not be interviewed, [REDACTED] would have him [illegible] seen after any interview by FBI Agents. [REDACTED] has stated he would voluntarily consent to a polygraph examination "at any time". The only questions to be asked of [REDACTED] would be concerning captioned matter. Therefore, the polygraph technique would not jeopardize any other prosecutive action, either local or federal that might be contemplated against [REDACTED] however, it is not known that any such action is contemplated at the present time. In addition, it is also not known whether or not the subject has had a prior polygraph exam.
---
ARMED & DANGEROUS.
---
b6 b7C b7D b7F
---
3 DB Cooper-13013
Serials: 164-2111, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-6321