SA Thomas J. Manning to SAC Seattle re Cascade Motors contact, Longview

Document date 9 June 1975

Part 35page 1301 pageDB Cooper-13536

Open in FBI Vault (Part 35, page 130 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-35:130-130

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-35:130-130

Document: Memo SA Thomas J. Manning to SAC Seattle re Cascade Motors contact, Longview
Id: Cooper-Part-35:130-130
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-35%3A130-130

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 35 p. 130 (DB Cooper-13536), Memo, dated 9 Jun 1975 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-35%3A130-130

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 JULY 1973 EDITION ~GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum

TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) DATE: 6/9/75

FROM : SA THOMAS J. MANNING [REDACTED b6/b7C]

SUBJECT: NORJAK [REDACTED b6] RE: [REDACTED b6/b7C]

---

Re memo of SA ROBERT H. WICK, 5/16/75

On 5/27/75 [REDACTED b6] (formerly Cascade Motors) Longview, Washington advised she would have to locate her payroll records for November, 1971 to determine if [REDACTED b7C] was at work on date of incident.

On 5//28/75 [REDACTED b6] COWLITZ County SO, Kelso, Washington furnished two photographs of [REDACTED b6/b7C] [REDACTED] and the other a Cowlitz County SO photo dated 9/1/72. The description of [REDACTED b6] in that SO file is as follows: Sex Male Race White D of B [REDACTED b6/b7C] 5'9" 140 lbs. Brown hair Blue Eyes Light complexion Slender build

[REDACTED b6/b7C]

Both pictures are attached for filing

---

On 6/9/75 [REDACTED b6] (supra) advised she had located her files re [REDACTED b6/b7C] employment. The payroll record reflects only information that from period 11/16/71 to 11/30/71 (an 88 hour pay would have been his maximum)- The payroll record reflects he only missed four hours during that period. From this record it can be presumed that a distinct possibility exists that [REDACTED b6/b7C] was at work during hijack period but his exact work dates and times cannot be verified through records.

---

[Handwritten] [guess: Review] [guess: limitation] [guess: File] [guess: Limitation] [guess: No Further] [guess: Action]

(2) TJM/

[Stamp] ELIMINATED [guess: 9/1]-6565 [Stamp] INDEXED - [Stamp] SERIALIZED - [guess: et] FILED [Stamp] [guess: JUN] 1 1975

Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan DB Cooper-13536

Serials: SE 164-81