SAC Seattle to SAC WFO re NORJAK suspect review
Document date 26 December 1973
Also filed at: Part 102 p. 212 · Part 103 p. 310
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-35:169-169
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-35:169-169 Document: Airtel SAC Seattle to SAC WFO re NORJAK suspect review Id: Cooper-Part-35:169-169 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-35%3A169-169 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 35 p. 169 (DB Cooper-13112), Airtel, dated 26 Dec 1973, serial SE 164-81-6376 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-35%3A169-169
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 12/26/73
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL AIR MAIL (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, WFO (164-169) FROM: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
RE: [REDACTED - b6/b7C]
Re Minneapolis teletype to WFO and Seattle dated 12/[guess: 0]5/71.
Referenced communication set forth lead for WFO to advise Minneapolis and Seattle of results of investigation concerning suspects suggested by [REDACTED] Northwest Orient Airlines, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
WFO is requested to review their file and furnish Seattle with the name of the subject suggested by [REDACTED] and the date and type of communication sent to Seattle concerning this matter.
ARMED & DANGEROUS [REDACTED - b6/b7C]
---
(2)- WFO 3 - Seattle RNN/rse (5)
---
164-81-6376 SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED [guess: &] FILED [illegible]
---
Approved: _______________ Special Agent
---
DB Cooper-13112
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-6376, WF 164-169
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.