SA to SAC Seattle re Boeing personnel file and employment history of NORJAK suspect

Document date 16 January 1975

Part 35pages 282–2832 pagesDB Cooper-13258–13259

Open in FBI Vault (Part 35, page 282 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-35:282-283

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-35:282-283

Document: Memo SA to SAC Seattle re Boeing personnel file and employment history of NORJAK suspect
Id: Cooper-Part-35:282-283
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-35%3A282-283

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 35 pp. 282–283 (DB Cooper-13258–13259), Memo, dated 16 Jan 1975 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-35%3A282-283

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 JULY 1973 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum

---

TO :SAC (164-81-6427) DATE: 1/16/75

FROM :SA [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

SUBJECT:NORJAK

---

Re Los Angeles airtel to Seattle, 12/23/74.

On 1/15/75, [REDACTED] The Boeing Company, Seattle, Washington, provided the personnel file of [REDACTED] that reflected the following information:

DOB [REDACTED] POB [REDACTED] Address [REDACTED] Seattle [REDACTED] Seattle Social Security # [REDACTED] Height 5'8" Weight 135 lbs. Eyes Brown Hair Black Race Caucasian Relatives Father [REDACTED] Sunneyvale, California Mother [REDACTED] Winchester Bay, Oregon [REDACTED]

Employment History

[REDACTED]

---

16 4-81-6 [partially legible] SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _4L_ FILED _AL_ JAN 1 6 1975 FBI - SEATTLE

---

JRM/djs (2)

---

ELIMINATE Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

---

DB Cooper-13258

SE 164-81-6427

---

Employment History (Cont'd)

[REDACTED]

The file reflects that [REDACTED] worked at Boeing from [REDACTED] terminating because he felt he was treated unfairly in his last assign- ment and generally had conflicts with his supervisor whom he indicated had discriminated against him. At his exit interview, he indicated that he was taking employment with Town Carpets, Seattle, [REDACTED] He was evaluated in the top 20% of his section and considered rehirable.

The file reflects that [REDACTED] volunteered that he had been [REDACTED] fined $150 and had additionally [REDACTED] with no additional information regarding the location of the citations.

---

DB Cooper-13259

Serials: SE 164-81-6, SE 164-81-6427