Identification Division latent fingerprint report to SAC Richmond re NORJAK comparison
Document date 22 November 1976
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-38:326-326
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-38:326-326 Document: Identification Division latent fingerprint report to SAC Richmond re NORJAK comparison Id: Cooper-Part-38:326-326 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-38%3A326-326 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 38 p. 326 (DB Cooper-15001), Form, dated 22 Nov 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-38%3A326-326
1-336 (Rev. 6-17-76)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Washington, D. C. 20537 REPORT of the IDENTIFICATION DIVISION LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION
YOUR FILE NO. 164-74 FBI FILE NO. 164-2111 LATENT CASE NO. [redacted]
November 22, 1976
TO: SAC, Richmond
RE: NORJAK
---
REFERENCE: Airtel 11-5-76 EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Richmond SPECIMENS:
The previously reported latent prints in the captioned case are not identical with the finger- prints of [redacted] born [redacted] U.S. Army service [redacted]
No palm prints of [redacted] are available for comparison.
---
2 - Seattle (164-81)
---
FBI — SEATTLE
---
THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DB Cooper-15001
Serials: 164-2111, RH 164-74, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.