ADIC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re attorney whose studio client claims contact with the hijacker
Document date 15 November 1976
Part of: ADIC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re NORJAK prosecutive discussion
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-38:333-333
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-38:333-333 Document: Airtel ADIC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re attorney whose studio client claims contact with the hijacker Id: Cooper-Part-38:333-333 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-38%3A333-333 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 38 p. 333 (DB Cooper-15008), Airtel, dated 15 Nov 1976, serial SE 164-81-7184 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-38%3A333-333
FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)
FBI
Date: 11/15/76
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code) AIRTEL AIR MAIL Via _______________ (Precedence)
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-91)
FROM: ADIC, LOS ANGELES (164-497) (P)
RE: NORJAK OO: Seattle
---
On 11/5/76, [REDACTED] Encino Law Center, Penthouse 1, 15915 Ventura Boulevard, Encino, California, telephone [REDACTED] telephonically contacted the Los Angeles Office of the FBI and related as follows:
He represents a client who is [REDACTED] [REDACTED] affiliated with a motion picture studio preparing a motion picture to be released in the near future. [REDACTED] made reference to a hypothetical situation concerning a crime which occurred about five years ago, was very newsworthy, and on which the Statute of Limitations would run in about three weeks. He stated his client was concerned with the criminal liability of himself, the studio, and [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] alleges the story is based on conversations which [REDACTED] with the perpetrator of the crime after the crime was committed. [REDACTED] stated he did not know the validity of the information furnished to him by his client, [REDACTED] who has asked that he, [REDACTED] attempt to obtain some type of written immunization to protect himself, the studio, and [REDACTED] [REDACTED] from prosecution upon release of the motion picture. [REDACTED] stated he believes [REDACTED] would voluntarily come forth, identify himself,
---
(2) - Seattle 2 - Los Angeles
crs/cks (4)
Approved: [signature] Special Agent in Charge
Sent _______ M [Per] ____
164-81-7184
---
DB Cooper-15008
Serials: LA 164-497, SD 164-91, SE 164-81-7184