SAC Portland to Director and Seattle enclosing Cooper indictment
Document date 26 November 1976
Part of: SAC Portland to Director enclosing copy of NORJAK indictment
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-38:374-374
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-38:374-374 Document: Airtel SAC Portland to Director and Seattle enclosing Cooper indictment Id: Cooper-Part-38:374-374 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-38%3A374-374 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 38 p. 374 (DB Cooper-15053), Airtel, dated 26 Nov 1976, serial SE 164-81-9212 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-38%3A374-374
FBI Date: 11/26/76
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL (Precedence) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
---
TO: DIRECTOR, FBI (164-2111)
FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41)(P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO: Seattle)
Re Portland teletype to Bureau, et al, 11/24/76.
Enclosed herewith for the Bureau and Seattle is one copy each of the indictment returned 11/24/76, by U. S. Grand Jury, Portland, Oregon, charging Unsub as JOHN DOE, aka DAN COOPER, with violations of Aircraft Piracy and Hobbs Act Statutes.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
[guess: sus] G[illegible] [guess: sus]. G[illegible] SU[illegible]3 [guess: E]
---
2 - Bureau (Enc. 1) 2 - Seattle (164-81)(Enc. 1)(redd Par 2 - Portland
RPH:lbn (6)
---
164-8|-9212 SEARCHED ______ INDEXED ______ SERIALIZED ____ FILED ____ NOV 30 1976 FBI—SEATTLE
---
Approved: _________________ Sent _________________ M Per _________________ Special Agent in Charge GPO: 1975 O - 590-992 DB Cooper-15053
---
b6 b7C
Serials: 164-2111, PD 164-41, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-9212
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.