Identification Division Latent Fingerprint Section report (Form 1-336) to SAC Little Rock re insufficient identifying data
Document date 23 December 1976
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-39:041-041
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-39:041-041 Document: Identification Division Latent Fingerprint Section report (Form 1-336) to SAC Little Rock re insufficient identifying data Id: Cooper-Part-39:041-041 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-39%3A041-041 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 39 p. 41 (DB Cooper-15200), Form, dated 23 Dec 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-39%3A041-041
1-336 (Rev. 6-17-76)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Washington, D. C. 20537 REPORT of the IDENTIFICATION DIVISION LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION
YOUR FILE NO. 164-22 December 23, 1976 b6 FBI FILE NO. 164-2111 b7C LATENT CASE NO.
TO: SAC, Little Rock
---
RE: UNSUB., AKA DAN COOPER; NORTHWEST AIRLINES FLIGHT #350 PORTLAND, OREGON, TO SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 11/24/71 CAA - HIJACKING; EXTORTION
---
REFERENCE: Airtel 12/15/76 EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Little Rock SPECIMENS:
Inasmuch as numerous fingerprint cards are contained in our Identification Division files for individuals with name and descriptive data similar to the [REDACTED] named in the referenced airtel, no latent print comparisons b6 were conducted. Additional information, such as date and b7C place of birth, FBI number, arrest number, social security number, and Army service number, is requested in order to possibly locate fingerprints for this individual.
---
(2) - Seattle (164-81) [handwritten: 114-81-7271[guess: 6]] b6 b7C Assistant Director, [REDACTED] DEC 30 1976 THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FBI-SEATTLE
DB Cooper-15200
Serials: 164-2111, LR 164-22, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.