To SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect
Document date 26 January 1977
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-39:122-122
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-39:122-122 Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect Id: Cooper-Part-39:122-122 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-39%3A122-122 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 39 p. 122 (DB Cooper-15289), Memo, dated 26 Jan 1977, serial SE 164-81-7324 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-39%3A122-122
SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) 1/26/77
SC [redacted]
NORJAK. OO: Seattle
---
[initials/signature]
---
SUSPECT: [redacted]
---
[redacted] employed at the Social Security Administration, tel [redacted] appeared at the Seattle office of the FBI and offered the name of [redacted] as a possible suspect in captioned matter. [redacted] advised that he, at one time, had worked with [redacted] at the Co-munity Services Admin. and noted the following observations:
[redacted] was a disciplined individual whose hobby was charting airline routes. [redacted] also reportedly had medical training but it is unknown to [redacted] if he was an experienced parachutist of flier. He described [redacted] as a white male, age late 30's to early 40's at the time of the skyjacking, 5'10" tall, slight build who has dark hair and does not wear glasses.
[redacted] was exhibited the 3 composite drawings of the UNSUB and he identified one as looking the most like [redacted] and the other 2 bore no resemblance to him at all.
Furnished for possible future reference.
---
FEE/fee (2)
---
164-81-7324 [stamp: SEARCHED... INDEXED... SERIALIZED... FILED... JAN 28 1977 FBI — SEATTLE]
---
DB Cooper-15289
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-7324
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.