SAC Seattle to SAC Kansas City re NORJAK suspect military record
Document date 7 February 1977
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-39:178-178
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-39:178-178 Document: Airtel SAC Seattle to SAC Kansas City re NORJAK suspect military record Id: Cooper-Part-39:178-178 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-39%3A178-178 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 39 p. 178 (DB Cooper-15344), Airtel, dated 7 Feb 1977, serial SE 164-81-7353 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-39%3A178-178
FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)
FBI
Date: 2/7/77
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL (Precedence)
---
TO : SAC, KANSAS CITY (164-80)
FROM : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE BUFILE 164-2111
RE: [REDACTED]
Re Seattle airtel to Kansas City dated 1/3/77.
For the information of the Kansas City and Honolulu Divisions, St. Louis has reported that it was unable to locate a military record for [REDACTED] SSAN [REDACTED]
For details as to steps to process suspects in the NORJAK case, Kansas City is referred to Seattle Report of SA [REDACTED] dated 5/30/73.
Kansas City is requested to advise Seattle as expeditiously as possible when a thorough processing of suspect [REDACTED] has been accomplished and in addition is requested to advise Seattle of whether interview of [REDACTED] is desired.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
2 - Kansas City 1 - Honolulu (164-85) (Info) 3 - Seattle RNN:skh (6)
164-81-7353
---
Approved: _______________ Sent: __________ M Per ___________ Special Agent in Charge GPO 1975 O - 590-902 DB Cooper-15344
Serials: 164-2111, HN 164-85, KC 164-80, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-7353
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.