SAC Seattle to SAC San Francisco re NORJAK suspect suggested in 1972
Document date 21 April 1977
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-39:411-413
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-39:411-413 Document: Memo SAC Seattle to SAC San Francisco re NORJAK suspect suggested in 1972 Id: Cooper-Part-39:411-413 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-39%3A411-413 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 39 pp. 411–413 (DB Cooper-15625–15627), Memo, dated 21 Apr 1977, serial SE 164-81-7488 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-39%3A411-413
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 JULY 1973 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Memorandum
TO : SAC, SAN FRANCISCO (164-220) DATE: 4/21/77
FROM : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE BUfile 164-2111
RE: [REDACTED]
---
Re San Francisco airtel to Seattle, dated January 24, 1977.
For the information of the San Francisco Division, [REDACTED] was suggested as a suspect in this matter on February 9, 1972. [REDACTED] is described as follows:
Name: [REDACTED] Race: Caucasian Sex: Male Height: 5'10" to 6'0" Weight: 165 pounds Build: Medium Hair: Black Eyes: Blue Date of Birth: [REDACTED] Place of Birth: [REDACTED]
On February 17, 1972, [REDACTED] was interviewed by the FBI in Los Angeles, California. It was noted at that time that he does bear a resemblance to the artist's conception of UNSUB in this matter and that [REDACTED] advised he was formerly a paratrooper in the military. [REDACTED] claimed no knowledge whatsoever of captioned
---
2 - San Francisco (164-220) 3 - Seattle (164-81) RNN/jcb (5)
164-81-7488
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
DB Cooper-15625
---
b6 b7C b6 b7C b6 b7C
SE 164-81
---
hijacking and stated he would cooperate fully with the FBI's investigation. [REDACTED] claimed he was employed as [REDACTED] by Abco Chemicals in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and worked the entire day of November 24, 1971, in that capacity. [REDACTED] could not recall any specific contacts he made, stating he left [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Colorado Springs, about 9:00 a.m. and then returned about 4:00 or 4:30 p.m. [REDACTED] advised that he was required, as part of his employment with Abco, to submit at the end of each week to Abco headquarters, in Irwin, Pennsylvania, records containing dates and names of persons contacted in Colorado Springs, during the previous week.
---
Investigation at Colorado Springs, Colorado, revealed [REDACTED] resided with [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Colorado Springs, from September 16, 1971, through January 11, 1972. [REDACTED] maintained checking and savings accounts at the Academy Boulevard Bank, Colorado Springs, but no significant account activity noted with the exception of $1,200 deposit on December 30, 1971. There was no safety deposit box rented at that bank by [REDACTED]
---
[REDACTED] of the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Colorado Springs, advised after viewing the artist's conception of UNSUB in this matter, stated that in her opinion it did not resemble [REDACTED].
---
A copy of [REDACTED] weekly reports were obtained from Abco, Inc. in Irwin, Pennsylvania, and attempts by Agents at Colorado Springs, Colorado, to verify [REDACTED] location on November 24, 1971, proved negative in that some of the addresses listed were not valid and others, although valid, personnel at the various locations could not remember [REDACTED]
---
On September 5, 1972, NORJAK eye witness [REDACTED] [REDACTED] stated after viewing a photograph of [REDACTED] that he was not identical to UNSUB in this matter.
---
DB Cooper-15626
---
2
SE 164-81
---
In view of the apparent discrepancy between [REDACTED] age at the time of the hijacking, i.e. [REDACTED], and the age UNSUB was thought to be at the time of the hijacking, that of approximately 45 years old, no further investigation will be conducted concerning [REDACTED] at this time; however, should any new information come to the attention of the San Francisco Division, which would indicate that [REDACTED] should be rein- vestigated as a suspect in this matter, San Francisco is directed to advise Seattle of this new information and conduct investigation deemed appropriate.
---
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
b6 b7C
---
3 DB Cooper-15627
Serials: 164-2111, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-7488, SF 164-220
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.