SAC Seattle to SAC Anchorage re NORJAK
Document date 30 August 1977
Part of: SAC Seattle to SAC Anchorage re composite identification lead
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-40:252-253
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-40:252-253 Document: Airtel SAC Seattle to SAC Anchorage re NORJAK Id: Cooper-Part-40:252-253 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-40%3A252-253 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 40 pp. 252–253 (DB Cooper-16047, DB Cooper-16050), Airtel, dated 30 Aug 1977, serial SE 164-81-7658 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-40%3A252-253
FD 36 (Rev. 2-11-71)
FBI
Date: 8/30/77
Transmit the following in (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL (Precedence)
---
TO : SAC, ANCHORAGE (164-59)
FROM : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (A) OO: SEATTLE BUFILE 164-2111
RE: [REDACTED]
---
Re Seattle letter to Anchorage, dated 4/11/77; Anchorage letter to Seattle, dated 6/10/77.
For the information of the Anchorage and Portland Divisions, [REDACTED] has been identified as the true name of former suspect [REDACTED] (Protect), of [REDACTED] Washington, advised that he [REDACTED] at the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] apparently was [REDACTED] [REDACTED] he worked [REDACTED] a couple of weeks before the statute of limitations ran out on the hijacking in question, [REDACTED] the effect that it was only a couple of weeks until the statute of limitations runs out on D. B. COOPER. comments were apparently [REDACTED]
---
3 - Anchorage 3 - Portland (5)- Seattle RNN:dch (11)
164-81-7658
Approved: Special Agent in Charge
Sent _______ M Per _______
GPO 1975 O - 48 994 DB Cooper-16047
FD 36 (Rev. 2-11-70)
FBI
Date: 8/30/77
Transmit the following in _____ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL _____ (Precedence)
---
TO : SAC, ANCHORAGE (164-59)
FROM : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (A) OO: SEATTLE BUFILE 164-2111
RE: [REDACTED]
---
Re Seattle letter to Anchorage, dated 4/11/77; Anchorage letter to Seattle, dated 6/10/77.
For the information of the Anchorage and Portland Divisions, [REDACTED] has been identified as the true name of former suspect [REDACTED] (Protect), of [REDACTED] Washington, advised that he [REDACTED] at the [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] apparently was [REDACTED] [REDACTED] he worked [REDACTED] a couple of weeks before the statute of limitations ran out on the hijacking in question, [REDACTED] the effect that it was only a couple of weeks until the statute of limitations runs out on D. B. COOPER. [REDACTED] comments were apparently [REDACTED]
---
3 - Anchorage 3 - Portland (5)- Seattle RNN:deh (11)
164-81-7658
Approved: _____ Sent _____ M Per _____ Special Agent in Charge
GPO: 1975 O - 590-932 DB Cooper-16050
Serials: 164-2111, AN 164-59, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-7658
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.