SAC Sacramento to SAC Seattle re Rackstraw trial in Calaveras County
Document date 27 July 1978
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-40:393-393
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-40:393-393 Document: Airtel SAC Sacramento to SAC Seattle re Rackstraw trial in Calaveras County Id: Cooper-Part-40:393-393 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-40%3A393-393 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 40 p. 393 (DB Cooper-16021), Airtel, dated 27 Jul 1978, serial SE 164-81-7491 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-40%3A393-393
AIRTEL 7/27/78
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, SACRAMENTO (164-50) (RUC)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (A) OO: SEATTLE BUFILE 164-2111
---
Re ROBERT WESLEY RACKSTRAW Sub Number 933 [redacted]
Re Seattle airtel to Sacramento, 7/6/78.
On 7/26/78, [redacted] Calaveras County SO advised that he expected the trial of ROBERT RACKSTRAW was in its final stages and expected to be completed in two weeks.
---
The following investigation was conducted by SC [redacted]
AT SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA:
On 7/21/78, [redacted] California Department of Motor Vehicles, Driver's License Section, advised that a search of their files failed to locate any California driver's license for [redacted] date of birth [redacted] described as 6', 185 lbs., brown hair, and blue eyes.
---
No record could be located for [redacted] aka [redacted]
No further investigation is outstanding in the Sacramento Division, therefore, this matter is being RUC'd at this time.
---
(2) - Seattle 2 - Little Rock (164-22) 1 - Sacramento TRK:mml (5)
---
SUB 933 164-81-7491 INDEXED SERIALIZED FILED JUL 29 1978 FBI — SEATTLE
---
DB Cooper-16021
Serials: 164-2111, LR 164-22, SC 164-50, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-7491
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.