SAC Little Rock to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, with leads for Seattle Division
This copy: Part 41 pp. 512–513Also filed at Part 121 pp. 62–63 (primary) · Part 121 pp. 132–133
This copy’s own title
SAC Little Rock to SAC Seattle re University of Arkansas contacts, NORJAK
Document date 20 September 1977
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 121 pp. 62–63.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-41:512-513
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-41:512-513 Document: Airtel SAC Little Rock to SAC Seattle re University of Arkansas contacts, NORJAK Id: Cooper-Part-41:512-513 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-41%3A512-513 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 41 pp. 512–513 (DB Cooper-15636, DB Cooper-16635), Airtel, dated 20 Sep 1977, serial SE 164-81-7672 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-41%3A512-513
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: Teletype ☐ Imm[ediate] ☐ TOP SECRET Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET Airtel ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ E F T O ☐ CLEAR Date 9/20/77
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-812) FROM: SAC, LITTLE ROCK (164-22) (P) SUBJECT: NORJAK (A) OO: SEATTLE
---
Re Little Rock teletype to Director, 9/1/77.
On 9/16/77, [REDACTED] were contacted at the University of Arkansas after several attempts had been made to contact them earlier. [REDACTED] stated that he is very difficult to contact at home inasmuch as [REDACTED] stated that she is only in Fayetteville, Arkansas, from Friday morning until Monday afternoon.
Both [REDACTED] were cooperative. [REDACTED] stated that he had finally told [REDACTED] that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] were planning any further contact with them until the FBI gave them an indication that it was proper to reinstate the contact with the [REDACTED] was advised that the FBI was not trying to control his [REDACTED] activities, however, in the interest of justice it was hoped that he and his wife would refrain from entering into any [REDACTED] contracts until after the case had been disposed of.
[REDACTED] stated that at no time did she make an identification of D. B. COOPER from [REDACTED]
---
(2)- Seattle 2 - Little Rock RJOC/vae (4)
---
[handwritten] [guess: 12cb- 803] [handwritten] 164-81-7672 [stamp] [guess: ARMED] 2 FILED [illegible] SEP 2 1977 [illegible] Per [illegible]
---
DB Cooper 16635
LR 164-22
---
[REDACTED] She did note there were some similarities, however, she did not make any positive identification. She believed that her telephone conversation was probably recorded [REDACTED] and she believed that he tried to con her into releasing some confidential information, however, she does not believe that she revealed any confidential information and did tell him items that had appeared in the newspapers and on television.
---
[REDACTED] consented to a longer more thorough interview which would include all of the information she recalls from the time of the hijacking until the present time, however, she wondered whether she might be able to review a copy of the statement she gave to the FBI immediately after the hijacking, including a description of the man she knew as D. B. COOPER.
---
LEADS
SEATTLE DIVISION
AT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
Will furnish Little Rock with copy of the initial interview of [REDACTED] so that she may be intelligently interviewed regarding items therein.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
---
- 2 - DB Cooper-15636
---
b6 b7C b7D b6 b7C b6 b7C
Serials: 164-812, LR 164-22, SE 164-81-7672