SAC Atlanta to SAC Seattle re NORJACK, file destroyed

Document date 19 November 1979

Part 43page 581 pageDB Cooper-17244

Open in FBI Vault (Part 43, page 58 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-43:058-058

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-43:058-058

Document: Airtel SAC Atlanta to SAC Seattle re NORJACK, file destroyed
Id: Cooper-Part-43:058-058
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-43%3A058-058

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 43 p. 58 (DB Cooper-17244), Airtel, dated 19 Nov 1979 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-43%3A058-058

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Telotype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ Airtel ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 11/19/79

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, ATLANTA (164-642) (P) (SQUAD 2) SUBJECT: NORJACK CAA-AIR PIRACY (A) (OO: SEATTLE)

Re Baltimore airtel to Seattle, dated 11/9/79.

Captioned matter has been destroyed in the Atlanta Office and there is no information available concerning this matter.

Seattle should furnish Atlanta sufficient information regarding captioned matter after which time Atlanta will conduct necessary investigation regarding [REDACTED]

---

[signature]

---

2-Seattle 2-Baltimore 2-Atlanta RWT/lwg (6)

---

164-81 - 8199[illegible]

---

Approved: ______ Transmitted ______ (Number) (Time) Per ______ FBI/DOJ

---

DB Cooper-17244

---

b6 b7C

Suspe[ct] b6 b7C

Serials: AT 164-642, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.